【作者】 周琳；

【导师】 周江洪；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 法律硕士（非法学）（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 经济高速发展的今天,房地产市场日新月异,然而建筑纠纷与日俱增,其中以工程款结算的问题最为突出,因其既关系到发包人的利益,又牵涉了发包人、承包人、实际施工人等的利益保护。建设工程施工合同无效后,双方当事人的权利救济问题成为司法实践中的难点。《建设工程司法解释》细化和解释了原有《合同法》及《民法通则》等的规定,为无效建设施工合同工程款的结算提供了依据,但在适用中,仍存在不少问题。本文第一部分介绍了《建设工程司法解释》的历史沿革,对比分析了从《经济合同法》到《民法通则》、《合同法》、《建设工程司法解释征求意见稿》,到最后正式出台的司法解释,理解其修改的原因以及目的,通过分析其变化来提出建设工程施工合同无效之后的权利救济所存在的问题。第二部分整理总结了当前司法实践中,处理无效的施工合同结算的主要方式。笔者认为在工程质量合格的情况下,“参照合同约定”结算已经越来越为法院所采纳,只有在少数情况下适用于其他方式。而关于采纳“参照合同约定”结算的法理与实践,笔者分析对比关于其相互之间的分歧与吸收,提出“参照合同约定”有其合理性,其法理基础乃是不当得利返还,并不违背相关法理和原则。本文第三部分,笔者针对实际施工人提出请求以及“参照合同约定”结算的参照范围作出详细的解释与说明,以厘清“参照合同约定”的适用条件,明确“参照合同约定”结算的范围,并建议补充过错赔偿和收缴与没收的方式,以确保更完善的适用“参照合同约定”结算这一方式。本文最后部分,笔者根据前述分析,提出完善构想,总结了全文,提出论文中存在的不足,以期待在今后的学习工作中,能够真正寻求保护社会公共利益和维护社会公德的良策,并加以推广。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the real estate market,construction disputes is growing with the economic development so fast.the payment and settlement of the problemof the inalid contract is most significant, because of its relationship to both the interests of the client, and involve the contractor, and the construction of the actual benefit protection. When the project construction contract is invalid, due to the difficulty in judicial practice how to solve the settlement problem become more and more popular. "Judicial explanation for construction project" elaboration and explains the original "contract law" and "general principles of the civil law" regulation, some construction project contract settlement provides the basis, but it isn’t applicable,there are still many problems worth to analysis especially in practice.The first part of this paper the author introduces the judicial interpretation of history, comparison and analysis from the"economic contract law" to the general principles of the "civil law", "contract law", "judicial interpretation draft for construction project", and the formal judicial explanation acording of them. Understand the reason of these changes and the purpose based on these laws, through the analysis of changes to illustrate the invalid construction contract "with reference to the contract" the theoretical basis of the settlement.The second part summarize the current judicial practice.The author founds that in the main processing of invalid construction contract settlement,"reference to the contract" has become increasingly adopted by the court settlement, only in a few cases apply to any other way. And about the reason why to adopt "with reference to the contract" settlement, the author analyzed about the question and affirmation, although " reference to the contract" has its rationality, should be regarded it as a special way of handling invalid discount compensation, it does not violate the relevant law and the principle of law in fact.In this paper, the third part, the author aimed at an applicable scope "with reference to the contract" as well as the reference is to make a detailed explanation and illustration, to clarify the differences between the "with reference to the contract", put forward to improve the settlement proposal with reference to the contract, and to achieve a more proper way.In the end of this paper, the author briefly summarizes the full text, the main point of the proposed, to expect in the future work of learning, we should seek to maintain a new way for the social and public interests and social morality, and by extension.更多还原