【作者】 孙鹏；

【导师】 任海涛； 吴英；

【作者基本信息】 西南政法大学 ， 刑法学（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 随着我国经济的飞速发展,近年来财产性犯罪不断增加,其中抢劫罪和信用卡诈骗罪尤为突出。科技的进步与时代的发展,信用卡应运而生,信用卡在给人们带来便利的同时也引发了很多问题。信用卡诈骗的数量有增无减,表现出高发、频发的势头,而且往往波及的金额非常大。存折作为比较古老的一种信用凭证,已经快要退出历史舞台,但是存折与信用卡、借记卡不同,具有特殊性,它是属于信用卡的范畴还是一种普通的金融凭证呢?因此对存折是属于什么范畴的定性就不好把握。抢劫他人存折并使用行为的定性,在理论界有很大的争议,有的人定抢劫罪与诈骗罪数罪并罚,有的人认为应该只定诈骗罪,还有的人认为只定抢劫罪。到底该如何定罪,目前刑法没有明确的规定,因此亟需对此种方式的犯罪进行系统、前瞻的研究,从而以更好地做到罪刑法定,更好地打击犯罪。本文将通过司法实践中的一个具体案例,根据案情的基本情况、法理分析、根据分析得出结论、本案研究的启示的先后层次,对案件进行深入地研究分析,并得出自己的结论和对案件研究的启示。本文大约有2.2万字,由五部分组成。第一部分,引言。该部分主要包括写作的原因以及撰写本文的主要意义。其中原因在于随着时代的发展和社会各方面的进步,现有法律已经不能完全适应时代发展的需要,因此需要完善相关立法,以更好地打击犯罪。撰写本文的意义在于通过对本文深入的研究,熟知相关法律知识的同时提出自己的观点启示,为完善相关法律提出自己的建议。第二部分,案件的基本情况,其中又分为四小部分。包括案由,王某抢劫案。案情简介,王某抢劫他人存折后通过猜配密码的方式将钱取出,其中有一张存折因为密码错误没有得逞,后被公安机关抓获。分歧意见,此案共有三种意见,一种是王某的行为构成抢劫罪与信用卡诈骗罪,两罪应该数罪并罚。第二种是王某构成抢劫罪,其中金额为10000元的存折为未遂。第三种意见是王某应该构成抢劫罪既遂,抢劫犯罪数额为8550元。争议焦点,一是该存折的物理属性,二是抢劫存折并使用的定性,三是抢劫存折后通过猜配密码的方式没有取现成功,抢劫数额的计算问题。第三部分是法理分析。本部分为本文的核心内容,其中分为三小部分。第一小部分探究了存折的物理属性和范畴,进而与信用卡和票据做了对比分析,并且探究了信用卡诈骗罪之犯罪构成。第二小部分探究了抢劫他人存折并使用行为的定性分析。第三小部分探究了抢劫罪的犯罪形态。第四部分是本案分析与结论。结论是王某的行为构成抢劫罪。第五部分是本案研究的启示。从本案中可以看出我国现有法律存在不足,需加强立法,完善立法。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the rapid development of China’s economy in recent years, property crime continues to increase, robbery and credit card fraud is particularly prominent. Scientific and technological progress and the development of the times, came into the credit card, credit card brings convenience to people but also caused a lot of problems. Increasing the number of credit card fraud, exhibit high, the momentum of frequent and often involve very large amounts. As a relatively old passbook credentials, had almost quit the stage of history, but books and credit cards, debit cards differ, with particularity, it is within the scope of a credit card or financial instruments it? So what belongs to the category of books is qualitatively bad grasp. Rob others use books and qualitative behavior, in theory there is great controversy, and some man-robbery and fraud graft, some people think we should just set fraud, there are those who believe that only a given robbery crime. In the end how to criminalize the criminal law does not clearly defined, making it imperative that the criminal system were studied in this way, forward-looking, so as to better achieve of legality, to better fight crime. This article through the judicial practice of a specific case, according to the basic facts of the case, legal analysis, the analysis concluded that the case studies have revealed levels of cases in-depth research and analysis, and draw their own conclusions and Inspiration case studies.In this paper, about 2million words, composed of five parts.The first part, Introduction. This section includes the main reason for writing as well as the meaning of this writing. One reason is that along with the development and progress of all sectors of society, existing laws can not fully meet the needs of the times, and therefore need to improve the relevant legislation in order to better fight crime. Meaning that by the time of writing this article in-depth study, familiar with relevant legal knowledge at the same time put forward their views revelation, made their recommendations to improve the relevant laws.The second part, the basic circumstances of the case, which is divided into four smaller parts. Including the cause of action, Wang robbery. Case Description, Wang robbery passbook others by way of guessing the password with the money taken out, which has a book did not succeed because the password is wrong, after the public security authorities arrested. Differences of opinion, there are three views of the case, one is Wang’s conduct constituted the crime of robbery and credit card fraud, two crimes should graft. The second is Wang constitute a robbery, which amounted to 10,000 yuan passbook is attempted. The third opinion is Wang should constitute a robbery Accomplished. The focus of controversy, the physical properties of one of the books, the second is the use of qualitative and passbook robbery, the third is not taken now, by way of a successful password guessing with robbery passbook is Accomplished or attempted. The third part is the legal analysis. This part is the core of this paper, which is divided into three parts. The first part discusses the physical properties and the category book, and credit card bills and do a comparative analysis, and explores the constitution of the crime of credit card fraud. Qualitative analysis of the second part explores the robbery and use others passbook. The third part discusses the crime of robbery.The fourth part is the case analysis and conclusion. Wang concluded that the conduct constituted robbery.The fifth part is the revelation of the case study. As can be seen from the case of shortcomings of existing laws, the need to strengthen legislation and improve legislation.更多还原