【作者】 王宁；

【导师】 罗泽胜； 罗泽刚；

【作者基本信息】 西南科技大学 ， 法律硕士（法学）（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 虽说竞业限制协议是劳资双方意思表示一致的结果,但现实生活中仍然存在部分用人单位滥用其优势地位,为最大限度的维护自身的利益而对员工的再就业权利进行过分限制的情况,致使一部分劳动者无法利用自己原本熟悉的知识及技能谋生。另加之我国有关竞业限制制度的法律规定并不完善,导致该制度在运用中仍面临诸多司法实务困境。因此,有必要结合司法实践中出现的案例对竞业限制相关制度进行研究,以期公平公正目标的实现。本文从一则有关竞业限制协议效力的劳动争议案件出发,结合认定竞业限制协议效力的法律规定和相关理论,得出本案所涉竞业限制协议部分无效的结论。本文第一部分主要阐述基本案情,并总结出案件的争议焦点。第二部分围绕案件的两个争议焦点,展开论述。首先,通过分析竞业限制协议的性质、认定竞业限制协议效力的依据,得出本案所涉竞业限制协议违法限制了吴某权利的结论。其次,通过对竞业限制经济补偿金性质、支付原则的分析,得出本案竞业限制协议约定的经济补偿金部分免除了申请人的法定义务。最后,通过分析竞业限制违约金的性质得出本案有关违约金的裁决存在不当之处。第三部分结合我国有关竞业限制制度立法规定的不足,提出笔者对于解决此类纠纷的一些立法建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Although the non-competition agreement is the result of the two parties of labour and capital’s unanimous declaration of intention, there are some employers still abuse its dominant position in real life to limit employment rights for the purpose of safeguard their biggest interests. Besides that, China’s labor contract law is not perfect, resulting in the use of the system still face many difficulties in judicial practice. Therefore, it is necessary to study the competition restriction system, in order to achieve real justice goals.Through analysis of a non-competition agreement’s validity about labor dispute cases, combining with related theories of non competition agreement and the legal provisions, this paper concludes that the involved non-competition agreement is partially invalid. The first part of this article mainly states the basic facts, and sums up two focuses of dispute case. The second part discusses the controversial focus dispute of case. Firstly, it analyzes the nature of the non-competition agreement and the legal basis of affirming the effectiveness of it, reaching a conclusion that the involved non-competition agreement limits Wu’s rights.Then, it analyzes the nature of non-compete economic compensation and the principle of its payment, reaching a conclusion that the non-compete economic compensation partially exempt the obligation of the applicant. In the end, through the analysis of the nature of the non-compete penalty, reaching a conclusion that the verdict of the case is inappropriate. The third part, analyzes the lack of legislation about the non-compete system in China, and put forward some suggestions for dealing with such disputes of the author herself.更多还原