【作者】 张锦；

【导师】 拜荣静；

【作者基本信息】 兰州大学 ， 刑事诉讼法学（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 刑事发回重审制度通常是指第二审法院将上诉或者抗诉案件,因实体性或者因程序性原因发回原审法院重新审理的诉讼程序。刑事发回重审作为一项重要的诉讼制度,积极作用于纠正原审案件错误,保护审级利益等方面。但由于该制度在立法上存在瑕疵、司法实践中出现诸多问题,一直饱受争议。2012年颁布的《刑事诉讼法修正案》对该制度进行了修改和完善,然而因修改程度有限,很多重要的问题并未得到实质解决,因而有必要对我国刑事发回重审制度进行研究,以期进行进一步的完善。本选题以张某某案为例,通过对案情和诉讼程序的分析,总结出了刑事发回重审制度中因“事实不清,证据不足”的发回理由违背疑罪从无原则;两级法院为了规避责任而严重损害法院公信力;未决羁押和审限制度规定等配套制度不完善而严重损害被告人合法权益等问题,并提出相应的完善方案。除引言和结语外,本文主要分为五章。第1章为案情介绍,主要介绍张某某案的案情,最终判决结果以及本案争议的焦点问题;第2章为案件焦点问题分析,主要结合案例对刑事发回重审程序过程中所出现的问题进行总结和阐释;第3章为本案引致的刑事发回重审制度问题的法理探源,主要从法律理念、立法、司法等三个方面探究刑事发回重审制度问题产生的根源;第4章为域外相关制度设计的比较,主要是简述和介绍刑事发回重审制度在美国和德国的刑事诉讼法中的应用规则,并希望从中借鉴相关经验;第5章是我国刑事诉讼发回重审的制度完善,结合我国司法实践提出建议,循序渐进地来完成刑事发回重审制度的再完善进程。更多还原

【Abstract】 The criminal retrial usually means in the second trial, that the court due to substantive reasons or procedural reasons sends the case back to the original court. As a quite significant legal proceeding, criminal retrial plays a very important role in correcting mistakes happened in trial and protecting interests in system of appeals. However, because of major defects in criminal retrial procedure, there are lots of problems in justice practice. Meanwhile, a criminal retrial procedure is also controversial. In 2012, the new amendment to the criminal procedure law did a legislative perfection on criminal retrial procedure, but in a very limited way. Still some problems cannot be solved; therefore, it is indeed to further improve the procedure.This article takes case of Zhang as an example, through analyzing the details of this case,summarizes three primary problems: Criminal retrial by reason of “unclear facts or insufficient evidences” violates principle of no punishment for doubtful case of crime; two levels of courts use criminal retrial to avoid responsibility, which damage to the courts’ credibility; faultiness pending custody systems generate invasion of person rights, and also proposer countermeasures.This thesis mainly has five parts:The first part is case introduction, introduces basics details, verdict and main problems. The second part focus on the main problems happened in the case. Try to summarize and analyze issues combined with case during criminal retrial procedure. The third part digs the jurisprudence source of criminal retrial problems; investigates from three directions of legal ideas, legislation,and judicial. The fourth part is the comparison of extraterritorial systems, discussing about criminal retrial procedure major in the United States and Germany and hope to learn some expertise. The fifth part concerns on the re-improving of our criminal retrial procedure, presents some progressive legislative perfection combined with China’s reality.更多还原