【作者】 李波；

【导师】 夏秀渊；

【作者基本信息】 江西财经大学 ， 在职法律硕士（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 盗窃罪是侵财类犯罪中最常见的犯罪。随着社会的不断发展和进步,盗窃行为也日益呈现出多样化、复杂化的特点,它不仅对公民的人身、财产安全和社会秩序造成严重威胁,而且在司法实践中导致了很多疑难、复杂问题。对于盗窃罪五种行为方式,即“数额较大”、“多次盗窃”、“入户盗窃”、“携带凶器盗窃”和“扒窃”,均属可独立定罪的盗窃行为。应从刑法保护法益的变化上、从行为类型具体语词的理解上、从行为的既未遂区分上对盗窃类型进入深入细致的思考与探究,真正做到既防止主观入罪,又防止放纵犯罪,以便精准地适用法律、打击犯罪。本文共分五个部分。第一部分主要阐述的是盗窃罪定罪模式的类型及对我国盗窃罪定罪模式的分析。由于我国盗窃罪的定罪模式特殊性,是单一模式和双重模式并存的混合定罪模式。笔者对我国定罪模式进行梳理归纳,形成一个清晰的类型对比,探讨我国盗窃罪定罪模式的特点。第二部分是对盗窃罪侵害的具体法益进行深入分析,尤其是着重对三类新增加的盗窃罪类型所侵害的法益分析。新增加的这三种特殊类型,使得盗窃罪所保护的法益已从单纯的财产权益变成对财产权益和公民人身权利及公共安全的双重保护。第三部分是关于盗窃罪五种行为方式的认定及适用。该部分对盗窃罪的五种行为方式的展开分析,其中对“多次盗窃”和“数额较大”两种行为方式进行简要介绍,从而将分析重点放在新增加的三种类型上。笔者结合最新出台的司法解释,从语义上对各种类型的盗窃展开细致深入的理解和分析,并对其在司法实践中如何界定和适用进行认真的探究。第四部分分析盗窃罪的未遂、既遂形态,主要是对新类型盗窃罪的既遂与未遂的标准及区分展开研究,探讨了入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃行为的着手、完成标准。第五部分主要探讨了新增加的三类盗窃行为方式在司法实践中可能会出现的问题。着重讨论了新增加的盗窃类型同时触犯数个基本罪状、是否一律定罪类型以及行政处罚与刑事处罚相衔接的问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 Theft is considered as one of the most common property-embezzling crimes. With t he continuous development and progress of society, the forms of theft present a more co mplex and diversified tendency, which will not only represent a serious threat to the per sonal and property safety of citizens as well as social order and security, but also cause c omplex and difficult problems in judicial practice. For the five ways of theft, that is "the relatively large amount", "repetitious theft", "indoor theft", "theft with lethal weapon" and "pickpocket" which are classified as independently convicting act of theft. Variation s of protection of legal interests, comprehension of concrete words of behaviors and viol ation or attempted act should be taken into intensive inquiry and thinking so as to not on ly achieve the affect of avoiding Subjective incriminate and indulgence of crime, but al so apply law correctly, punish crime accurately .This study is divided into five parts. The first part:expounds type of Larceny conviction mode and analyze the characteristics of different types of theft conviction mode. Because the particularity of theft conviction in China, Which by both single-mode and dual-mode mixed. The author summarized to the current mixed conviction mode,and formed a clear type which contrast to identify the characteristics of Theft convicted mode in China. The second part:stealing the concrete analysis of interests. In this part the author mainly analyzes the three kinds of new type of theft by the infringement of legal interests. In addition to the brief introduction of the traditional embezzlement infringes upon the legal interests, for because of the new type theft makes legal interests may change in the situation are analyzed. The third part:the definition of theft behavior type. After this part is to modify the theft of five types of behavior analysis. Among them to modify the existing "theft" many times before and "relatively large" briefly introduces two types of behavior, and will increase the paper focus on the new "three types of analysis, combined with the latest judicial interpretation, analysis of its semantic understanding, aswell as how to apply on the judicial and define a serious inquiry.The fourth part:This part is mainly for special type of theft to attempted and accomplished, standards and to distinguish the study.The fifth part:mainly discusses the new type of three kinds of theft possible problem in the judicial practice, focus on the new type of theft at the same time breaking several basic charges, shall be convicted whether type and administrative punishment and criminal punishment of corresponding problems.更多还原