【作者】 许勇；

【导师】 程章灿；

【作者基本信息】 南京大学 ， 中国古典文献学， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 《耆舊績閡》是成書於南宋中期的筆記小說，主要記载了兩宋時期文人軼事、詩詞文章、奇談異聞等內容。對於研究宋代社會具有重要參考價值．鑒於研究現狀的不足，本文從文獻的角度來研究《耆舊續聞》，共分為五章。第一章《耆舊續聞》流傳考，從明清兩代書目著錄與他書載引兩方面對《耆舊續聞》的流傳作歷史性的考察，發現此書主要流傳與江浙一帶。并關注《耆舊續聞》的書名及作者。認為書名《西塘集耆舊績聞》、作者“陳鵠”之說系晚出。第二章《耆舊績聞》版本考，對現存的《耆舊續聞》的版本進行梳理，整理出流傳脈絡，並對重要版本加以論述與考證。通過對九個版本的考察，印證了第一章的结論。第三章陳鵠考，在第一章、第二章的基礎上，重新審视作者陳鵠說。筆者認為陳鵠不是《耆舊績開》的作者，他僅僅是明代的一個抄錄者。第四章《耆舊績聞》引書考， 系統考察《耆舊績聞》的構成，對前人“雜採眾書”說進行論證。并對所有條目加以考察，試圖找出其文獻來源．通過研究發現，此書抄錄他書甚多，作者自撰的成份較小。其書寫無明確體例。第五章《耆舊績聞》文獻價值考，在第四章的基礎上，對此書的文獻價值進行考量。筆者認為此書具有史料文獻價值、文學文獻價值以及筆記文獻價值。更多还原

【Abstract】 As a sketchbook, Qi Jiu Xu Wen was written in the middle of the Southern Song Dynasty. It contains the literary anecdotes, articles, poems and yarns from the 10th to the 13th century, which is of great reference value in studying the society of Song Dynasty. In view of the shortcomings in the present study, this thesis conducts a research on Qi Jiu Xu Wen based on a documentary analysis, which is divided into five chapters.Chapter I inspects the book’s spread in Ming and Qing Dynasty. According to the historical investigations in the bibliographic description and the materials quoted in other books, it is found that the book is mainly spreaded in Jiangsu and Zhejiang. We have also paid attention to the author and the title of the book, and come to a conclusion that the statement of "the author is Chen Hu" and the title "Xi Tang Ji Qi JiuXu Wen" appeared quite late.Chapter Ⅱ engages in the inspection of the book’s existing versions, making a systematic collation of them, as well as the elaborations and textual criticisms on some important ones. Based on the investigations of the nine versions, the conclusion of the first chapter has been confirmed.Chapter III takes "Chen Hu" as the research object. On the basis of the previous studies, a conclusion is drawn that the author of Qi Jiu Xu Wen is not Chen Hu, who was only a copyist in Ming Dynasty.Chapter IV investigates the literatures cited in Qi Jiu Xu Wen, with an aim to study its constitution, and dissects the previous view that the book was a colletion of many excerptions from other books. All the entries are inspected in this chapter, with an attempt to find out the literature resources. Through the study, it is found that the book does not have a clear writing style, of which the majority is extracted from other books.Chapter V discusses the book’s historical value. Through the analysis of the detailed contents of the book, we consider that it is of great reference value in the following three aspects:historical data, documentology and miscellaneous notes.更多还原