【作者】 李玲；

【导师】 吴家清；

【作者基本信息】 华南理工大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 被遗忘权因欧盟判例引发讨论,但它并不能算是一项新的法律权利。其仅适用于网络信息领域,其是建立在保护个人数据权利上的请求权,其本质是一项删除权。其只针对发布在网络上的特定信息,其权利义务主体都是特定的。它是保护个人人格利益的权利,一项依附于个人数据权的请求权。被遗忘权是一项侵权请求权,具体是指当信息已经不相关、不必要或已过时,数据主体有权利请求数据处理控制人删除或移除相应的信息链接。对应的数据处理者有义务在接到被遗忘权申请时予以审查后删除或不予删除。被遗忘权的申请人(权利人)是信息主体,一般指普通公民,被申请人(义务人)是信息处理控制者,应该包括公共机构与私人机构。其保护的信息内容是能够被识别到个人的,并且是与信息主体不相关、不必要且已过时的,信息内容还必须是事实信息,且是显性数据。被遗忘权的客体是对信息进行自动化处理并形成系统的过程。被遗忘权与隐私权关系密切,他们同时保护人格利益的权利,但其保护范围是交叉的,侵权行为也互相重合。同时,被遗忘权与名誉权、肖像权、姓名权都有竞合关系。但是其保护侧重点不同。另外,公共利益与言论自由是被遗忘权保护的例外和限制,但是信息的公开与真实并不构成抗辩理由。我国虽然没有建立被遗忘权的法律制度,但也有类似的法律规定和法律实践,由此我们要实现被遗忘权的本土化,首先必须建立个人数据权,在此基础上完善被遗忘权的侵权制度,尤其是归责原则应该与我国现行《侵权责任法》相协调。因此,被遗忘权应该是是直接侵权而非间接侵权行为,应适用严格责任而非过错责任,其应是一项侵权的免责条款而非侵权的保护依据。更多还原

【Abstract】 The right to be forgotten was sparked by the EU case law but, it is not a new legal right. It applies only to the field of network information and the right of claim is based on the protection of personal data rights, its essence is a right to delete. The right only aim to the specific information released on the network, the subjects of right and obligation are specific.The right to be forgotten is a tort claim, particularly when the information is inadequate, irrelevant, excessive, and the subject of data has the right to request the data processing controller to delete or remove the corresponding information link. Data processing controllers are obligated to review and decided to delete or not.The subject(the applicant) of the right to be forgotten generally refers to the ordinary citizens, the subject(the respondent) of obligation is the information processers and controllers, include the public and private sectors. The data can be linked to an individual, and it is inadequate, irrelevant, excessive, and it must also be factual and dominant data. The object of the right to be forgotten is the system of processing data.The right to be forgotten is close to privacy. They also protect the interests of personality rights, but the scope of protection is crossed, the infringement behaviors are also coincided. At the same time, the right to be forgotten has a competing relationship with Defamation and Portrait But, their protection has different focuses. In addition, the public interest and the freedom of speech is an exception and restriction of the right to be forgotten but, the disclosure unreal of the information does not a defense.Although the right to be forgotten is not established in the China legal system, but there also has a similar right and practice. Thus we need to achieve the localization of the right to be forgotten, we must firstly establish the right to personal data secondly. the basis of perfecting the infringement of the right especially, the imputation principle should be the “tort liability law” in China. Therefore, the right to be forgotten is the direct infringement not indirect infringement behavior, it should be applicable to strict liability not fault liability and it should be disclaimer article not a base of infringement.更多还原