我国刑事庭前会议制度的研究

【作者】 于萍；

【导师】 王圣诵；

【作者基本信息】 青岛大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 新刑事诉讼法对庭前准备程序做了新的规定,基本形成了我国刑事诉讼法的庭前会议制度。我国刑事诉讼法的庭前会议制度的设立,为刑事诉讼法注入了新的活力,为控辩双方提供了在庭前接触的平台,法官可以在庭审前听取其意见,集中解决诸如回避、非法证据排除等问题,对于确保庭审的顺利召开具有重要意义。然而,作为一项新的制度,庭前会议制度还处于起步阶段,许多内容尚存在不尽完备的地方。很多问题,新《刑事诉讼法》仅仅做了框架性的规定,许多实施的细节还尚需推敲。另外,学界对庭前会议的法理基础也没有进行充分的研究,对于庭前会议的很多理论与实务操作等具体问题尚存在较大的争议。笔者根据我国新《刑事诉讼法》、最高法《解释》以及最高检《刑诉规则(试行)》的相关内容,并且参考了其他学者的观点给庭前会议制度下了一个定义。其次,笔者介绍了国外有关庭前程序的相关制度,并对我国庭前会议制度的特点进行对比,凸显出我国庭前会议的“中国特色”。另外,笔者还对庭前会议的设立背景进行简要概述,从1979年《刑事诉讼法》,经过1996年的改革,再到如今的发展,庭前会议制度的设立必然有其内在的原因,通过背景的介绍,可以更加深刻的体现庭前会议的设立与司法实践的关系。之后,笔者将目前学者们对庭前会议的争议做了简要梳理,对现有的争论点进行分类阐述,并提出自己的观点和看法,同时笔者对自己的观点提出的原因和根据做了辩证性分析,详细论证主张该观点的意图,力图在现有的雏形下对庭前会议进行进一步的探讨,将庭前会议的问题具体化,力求在实践中真正推进庭前会议的适用。最后,笔者希望以自己的个人见解,针对庭前会议的漏洞从理论上提出完善的方法,争取对庭前会议做实质性的研究,笔者希望通过自己的抛砖引玉能对庭前会议发挥功能起一定的帮助作用,争取为庭前会议进一步发展以及实践的可行性提供借鉴。更多还原

【Abstract】 The pretrial procedure of new criminal procedural law was made a new regulation, and this regulation basically formed the system named pretrial meeting of our country’s criminal procedure law.Through the establishment of pretrial meeting system, it was added a new content to the criminal procedure law and provided the prosecuting and defending parties in the platform of contact before the formal trial. In the meeting, the judge could listen to both sides, and focus to solve problems such as avoidance, illegal evidence exclusion and so on. It is of great significance to ensure the smooth convening of the trial. However, as a new system, pretrial meeting system is still in the initial stage and many of its contents are not complete. For a lot of problems, the new "criminal procedural law" only made the provisions of the framework, many details of implementation also has yet to scrutiny. In addition, the academia study fully the legal basis of pretrial meeting, and they have a controversy about theories and practice or other things of pretrial meeting.According to the content of the new "criminal procedural law", the Supreme People’s Court "interpretation" and the supreme People’s Procuratorate “criminal procedural law rules(trial)", and Referencing to other scholars’ point of views, the author give a definition to pretrial meeting system. In addition, the author also gives a brief overview of the establishment of the background of pretrial meeting. The criminal procedure law in 1979 was amended in 1996. Undergoing many changes, the establishment of pretrial meeting must have its internal reasons. By introducing the background, the author can profoundly reflect the relationship between the setting up of pretrial meeting and the judicial practices. Later, the author will arrange current controversies about this system of scholars. The author will categorically expound the point of debate and put forward her own views and opinions. At the same time, the author will dialectically analyze the reason and source of her ideas and demonstrate in detail the intentions of the idea. Under the existing prototype, the author tries to make a further discussion about this meeting, and embody the problem, striving to truly propulsion the system applicable in practice. Finally, for the vulnerability of the system, the author hopes to theoretically put forward the methods. The author also hopes that through her own efforts to effectively promote system. And she strives to provide reference for its further development and the feasibility.更多还原