大陆与香港小学数学教科书比较研究

【作者】 周伟；

【导师】 胡金平；

【作者基本信息】 南京师范大学 ， 小学教育， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 教科书作为一种教育工具和教育资料,是课程实施的载体,也是课程的重要组成部分,在整个教育体系中具有重大意义。从20世纪八十年代中期开始,我国的教科书由“一纲一本”的“国定制”发展为“一纲多本”的“审定制”,国内出现了多个版本的小学数学教科书,对各个版本的小学数学教科书的研究也由此展开。大陆和香港同宗同源,香港地区由于历史原因在教材编写方面吸收较多的英国教科书编写的经验。但长期以来,大陆地区对香港地区的教科书的研究相对较弱。因此,本研究选择大陆地区使用率较高的苏教版教科书和香港地区使用率较高的现代版教科书两个版本的教科书作为比较研究的对象。通过比较,找到两地小学数学教科书的各自特点,及时吸收香港地区小学数学教科书编写的优点,为大陆地区小学数学教科书的完善和发展,提供借鉴。本文主要采用本文本分析法、文献法和比较法,对香港和大陆地区的课程标准、教材审查制度等宏观方面进行比较,又从文化要素、道德要素、科学要素3个方面对教科书所蕴含的价值取向进行比较,同时还结合具体的教学内容对两版教科书5-6年级的具体的教学内容从内容设计、编写体例、呈现形式等方面进行比较。通过比较发现：课程理念(包括课程标准)对教科书的影响是根本性的。苏教版教科书蕴含的文化要素、道德要素、科学要素要丰富于现代版,在内容的选取、知识的内在逻辑顺序的安排上要优于现代版。但在教科书的版式设计、教学软件的设计开发方面苏教版需向现代版学习。更多还原

【Abstract】 Serving as educational tools and educational data as well as carriers of curriculum implementation, textbooks are playing an important role in the whole educational system. Since the mid 1980s, the mainland has developed from "national policy" - "one teaching program, one textbook" into "validation criteria"- "one teaching program, many textbooks". Multiple versions of primary school mathematics textbooks have entered the market and thus push ahead the research on the use of textbooks of different versions accordingly.It is known to all that the mainland and Hong Kong SAR are of the same root. Because of historical reasons, textbooks compilation in Hong Kong areas has absorbed a lot of from British educational system and it create a blind spot for the mainland’s research on the use of textbooks of Hong Kong SAR. Therefore, this paper conducts a comparative study on frequently utilized textbooks of Jiangsu education version used in the mainland and popular ones of Modern version used in Hong Kong. Through comparison, this paper aims to discover each respective characteristic of primary school mathematic textbooks of the two places, thus will enable the mainland to learn from Hong Kong, providing reference for the primary school mathematic textbooks compilation’s further development and improvement in the mainland.This paper mainly adopts textual analysis method, documentary method and comparative method, contrasting so-called macroscopic aspects such as curriculum standard with examination of teaching material between the mainland and Hong Kong, making comparison among three values orientation inherited in the textbooks, namely, cultural element, moral element and scientific element. In the meanwhile, this paper compares different aspects such as content design, compilation style and presentation format between concrete teaching content of grade 5 to 6 of the two versions, combining with specific content of teaching.From the comparison, we can draw a conclusion that notion of course (including curriculum) is of great significance to the utilization of textbook. Comparing to Modern version, Su education version is rich in content design, compilation and presentation format. On the content selection and internal logic arrangement of knowledge, Su education version is superior as well. Nevertheless, there is room for Su education learning from Modern version on the layout design and development of instructional software of textbooks.更多还原