【作者】 王琳；

【导师】 刘海静；

【作者基本信息】 河南师范大学 ， 学科教学（专业学位）， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 当今,地区经济的繁荣兴盛势必是以优质教育为支撑。无论是祖国大陆各省还是与之隔海相望的台湾地区,在近年来都对本地区的教育体制进行了规模不一的改革创新。希望通过对比2010~2013年四年大陆新课标全国卷和台湾指考历史试题,从中得到启示,为我国中学历史教育继续改革和两岸历史文化深入交流提供参考。高考被大多数人比作鲤鱼跃龙门性质的一次考试,其重要地位和作用决定了从事教育工作的学者和教师必须对与高考相关的考试制度、课程设置、教科书、教学方法等有着深刻的了解,不同地区相互借鉴,促进教育更好地为社会服务。而作为同根生的海峡两岸地区有着相同的历史文化,却因为政治制度、经济体制、思想等种种原因,使得历史在教育方面的呈现有所差异。因此,通过对近年来两岸高考历史命题展开对比分析,可以对两地历史教育测量与评价方式差异有所领悟。众所周知,台湾作为亚洲四小龙之一,经济发展取得显著成果的同时教育也一直处于领先地位。了解台湾地区考试制度,对比研究两岸高考制度的发展,剖析两岸历史试题的命题指导思想、考试时间与分值、考试范围与教科书、以及题型结构和评分标准等,取其精华,结合大陆地区历史教育的实际情况提出建议几点建议:首先,改善试卷结构及评分标准;其次,注重学科间的交互考查,推动文科真正的“综合”;第三,丰富对史料的考查。为两岸更好的历史教育增砖添瓦。更多还原

【Abstract】 Nowadays, high quality education grows to be the backbone underpinning the prosperity of modern economy. Each province and region throughout mainland China and Taiwan, in recent years, has devoted great efforts to the reform and innovation of local education system. The present paper makes a comparison between the New Class national history papers and Taiwan history papers from 2011 to 2013, from which the author attempts to draw inspirations to obtain references, in order to better further the reform of general history education in high school and the cultural and historical communication across the strait.The entrance examination for college is commonly regarded as the most important exam in one’s lifetime. It demands that scholars and lecturers in the frontier of education not only be fully equipped with relevant examination system, curriculum, textbooks, teaching methods, etc, but also learn from each other to better serve the society through education. As an integral part of China, Taiwan shares the same culture and history, however, the history presented in our respective examination papers is not the case, owing to our different political system, economic system and ideology. Thus, the author learns to evaluate the history education in both areas by analyzing the recent history papers.It is known to all that Taiwan, one of the East Asian Tigers, successfully maintains its leading position in education as well as economy. The present paper compares the examination systems, analyze the proposition ideas, time and score, scope of examination and textbook, question and criteria and so on, take its essence and offer some suggestions in light of the reality. First, we should improve exam structure and assessment criteria. Second, students’ ability of thinking should be bringing up. Last, teachers need to pay attention to students a sense of time and history in process of teaching. The author attempts to contribute to the development of history education cross-strait.更多还原