【作者】 李娜；

【导师】 张志强；

【作者基本信息】 河南师范大学 ， 英语语言文学， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 在以往的结构主义语言学研究范式里,译者的主体性地位一直被边缘化。二十世纪七十年代翻译研究的“文化转向”,扩大了翻译研究的视野,译者在翻译活动中的主体性地位逐渐凸显,受到了越来越多的关注和研究。阐释学是一门关于文本理解和意义阐释的学科理论。施莱尔马赫、狄尔泰、海德格尔、伽达默尔等学者对早期阐释学的形成和发展作出了巨大的贡献。乔治·斯坦纳在前人的理论基础上,提出了“理解即是翻译”,并将翻译的过程描述为包括“信赖、侵入、吸收和补偿”的四个步骤,这种阐释学翻译理论为译者主体性的研究提供了一个独特的新视角。本文以莫言的小说《生死疲劳》的英译本为研究对象,以斯坦纳翻译阐释理论的四步骤说为分析框架,分别从语言和文化两个方面分析《生死疲劳》英译者葛浩文的翻译策略,旨在发现在翻译这一阐释过程中,译者是如何发挥他的主体性的。通过研究,笔者发现:在文本理解和翻译的过程中,译者葛浩文融入了自己的文化元素,对一些中国所特有的特殊文化词、句进行了不同程度的改写和归化,但译者有时也采用了直译加注、省略等方法。当原语文本的表现形式在目的语中缺失时,译者常常会做出调整。葛浩文通过能动性补偿,基本实现了两个文本间的出入平衡。葛浩文在翻译过程中采取的不同的翻译策略,正是译者主体性的充分体现。更多还原

【Abstract】 Translators’ subjectivity has long been neglected in the previous translation studies dominated by the structuralism linguistics. It was not until the 1970 s, when there was a “cultural turn” springing in translation studies that translators’ subjectivity began to draw more and more attention from the translation studies scholars and an increasing number of researches began to focus on translator’s role in translation process.Hermeneutics is a kind of theory that highlights the understanding and interpretation of the meaning of a text. Some prominent theorists such as Schleiermacher, Wilhelm Dilthey, Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer all made their contributions to the formation and development of early hermeneutics. Based on the findings of the above-mentioned scholars, George Steiner put forward the concept that “understanding is translation” and pointed out that the translator must experience four stages in translation process, namely trust, aggression, incorporation and compensation. Steiner’s hermeneutic theory of translation has provided a new perspective for translation studies and especially for the study of translators’ subjectivity.The author of this thesis chooses the English version of Sheng Si Pi Lao written by Mo Yan as a case study. Adopting George Steiner’s Hermeneutic motion as her theoretical framework, the author intends to analyze Goldblatt’s translation strategies in terms of culture and language, for the purposes of finding out how Goldblatt conducted his subjectivity in the translation process.Through her analyses, the author finds that in the translation process, Howard Goldblatt employed different translation strategies, such as rewriting and domesticating, literal translation plus annotation, omission and so on when translating some specific culture-loaded words or sentence structures in Chinese. Sometimes, when the forms of source language are vacant in target language, he chose to develop his subjectivity to convey the main information of the source text by changing the way of expression. He realized his objectives and successfully restored the balance between source text and target text by means of his compensation. Goldblatt’s subjectivity is thus fully embodied in his diverse translation strategies.更多还原