【作者】 王毅；

【导师】 彭熙海；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 法学， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 随着我国社会经济的发展和城乡一体化进程的加快,城市人口与农村人口之间的交流不断加强,流动也越来越频繁,应现实需求,越来越多的人选择到农村购置房屋,由此引发的农村宅基地房屋转让合同纠纷普遍出现。目前我国的法律法规对农村宅基地房屋转让问题的规定相对紊乱、政策导向和规范性文件也存在冲突,学术界对农村宅基地房屋转让合同的效力存在有效、无效及效力待定三种观点,司法实践中也产生了许多同案不同判的案例。无效的观点从法律对宅基地使用权流转的限制、宅基地的保障功能和农村宅基地房屋自由流转后有其不利一面等角度得出其结论,认为将农村宅基地房屋转让合同确认为无效既是对法律法规的遵从,又能更好的保障农民的基本权利,防止社会资源过度集中;效力待定的观点从宅基地的所有权归集体所有,村民处分其宅基地使用权属于无权处分他人所有之物的角度得出其结论,认为将农村宅基地房屋转让合同确认为效力待定能更好的保护所有权;有效的观点从合同有效要件、历史沿革、法律法规、现实需求等角度得出其结论,认为将农村宅基地房屋转让合同确认为有效既能保护当事人的合法权益、促进经济发展、提高资源利用率,又能解决争讼、起到法律定纷止争的作用。文章对农村宅基地房屋转让现状进行了剖析,对现存不同观点进行了对比,提出在不区分受让主体来自本集体、本集体以外的其他集体还是城镇的情况下应确认农村宅基地房屋转让合同有效的观点,并从法学基本理论、民法通则及合同法、物权法、确认农村宅基地房屋转让合同有效的现实意义等方面论证了观点的正当性。在此基础上,从修改现行法律法规、启动登记程序、确立宅基地法定租赁权、建立宅基地使用权自由转让制度的角度提出了农村宅基地房屋转让问题解决的具体途径。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the development of our social economy and the speeding up of urban-rural integration, urban population and rural population, the accomplishment of the flow is becoming more and more frequent, should the reality demand, more and more people choose to buy a home in the countryside, the resulting widespread house-site in the countryside housing transfer contract disputes.At present our country’s laws and regulations of the provisions of the housing transfer problem of house-site in the countryside relative disorders, policy guidance and normative documents and there is a conflict, academia of house-site in the countryside house the effectiveness of the contract confirmation is valid, invalid and three point of view, with pending validity in the judicial practice also produced many different connection with the case. Invalid views from the legal restrictions on the land circulation, land safeguard function and rural homestead housing free circulation after the flip side of its conclusion, that confirm the house-site in the countryside housing transfer contract is invalid to comply with laws and regulations, and to better safeguard farmers’ basic rights, prevent excessive concentration of social resources;With pending validity of views from the ownership of the land owned by the collective, the villagers dispose of housing land use right belong to have no right to dispose of all others point of its conclusion, think confirm housing transfer contract with pending validity of house-site in the countryside can better protect ownership;Effective point of view from the contract effective elements, history, laws and regulations, and realistic demand Angle to its conclusion, that confirm the housing transfer contract of house-site in the countryside can effectively protect the lawful rights and interests of the parties, and promote economic development, improve the utilization rate of resources, and can solve the dispute, have the effect of legal dispute on check for.Article makes an analysis about the present situation of house-site in the countryside house, compares existing different point of view of, in not distinguish between the main body from the collective, the collective group or other towns shall confirm the housing transfer contract of house-site in the countryside under the condition of effective point of view, and from the basic theory of law, the general principles of the civil law and contract law, property law, confirm the housing transfer contract effective practical significance of house-site in the countryside, demonstratesthe viewpoint. On this basis, from changes in laws and regulations, start the registration procedures, establish the homestead legal rights, establishing the paper discussed free transfer of housing land use right system of rural homestead housing transfer concrete means of problem solving.更多还原