【作者】 周锋；

【导师】 杜宇；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2014， 硕士

【摘要】 随着时代的发展,诈骗罪的手段不断复杂化和多样化,对于诈骗罪的研究,各类学说层出不穷,不管是理论界还是司法实务中,对诈骗罪的认识终究莫衷一是,各国学理中对诈骗罪的对象、行为方式、财产损失认识不同,造成了司法实践中对诈骗罪认定的困难,认定犯罪的故意是难点工作,诈骗嫌疑人往往会在案件办理过程中进行翻供来逃避法律的制裁,直接导致案件审理的困境。研究诈骗罪客观行为,去除主观因素的不稳定性,充分进行客观行为证据的收集,在现实中可以改变以“口供至上”办案模式。本文从诈骗罪的犯罪对象、行为方式、财产损失几个方面进行分析,结合相关司法实践中的案例,指出了诈骗罪客观行为的若干问题,试图使诈骗罪的认定更加明了,保护被害人权益,促进经济健康发展。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the development of the times, the means of fraud has become more complicated and diversified.For the study of the crime of fraud, all kinds of theories emerge in an endless stream.Whether in theory or in the judicial practice, understanding of the crime of fraud is unable to agree on which is right.The theory of object, the fraud, property loss caused different understanding, recognition of the crime of fraud in the judicial practice difficult.Determination of the crime of intentional is difficult work. Suspected of fraud often for confession to escape legal sanctions in the case in the process, directly led to the plight of the case.The objective behavior of the crime of fraud, remove the subjective factors of instability, full of objective behavior collection, in reality can be changed to "the first" case handling pattern.This article from the scope of the crime of fraud, behavior, behavior result in property damage in several aspects of the analysis.Combined with the case in the judicial practice, and points out some problems of objective behavior of the crime of fraud.Determination of the crime of fraud to make more clear, to protect the rights of the victim, and promote the healthy development of economy.更多还原