节点文献

内陆地区就地城镇化的路径选择

【作者】 王洋

【导师】 周伟林;

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 , 区域经济学, 2014, 硕士

【副题名】基于河南与江苏的比较研究

【摘要】 “就地城镇化”指的是不经过大规模的人口转移,在原有的农村地域完成的城镇化。就地城镇化在中国的城镇化道路中占据着重要的地位,对于吸收农村剩余劳动力、提高农民生活水平、扩大内需有特殊的经济社会意义。江苏、河南是中国沿海和内地就地城镇化比较有代表性的省份。江苏省的就地城镇化发展较早,整体实力较强,在城镇化率和非农化率上都远远高于河南;河南就地城镇化近年来呈现出加速发展的态势,县域实力增强、建制镇数量增多、城镇化率和非农化率的增长速度都非常迅速。分析两省的就地城镇化,不仅能更好的理解就地城镇化发达地区、以及就地城镇化快速发展地区各自的动力机制,还可以通过对比,为内陆地区的就地城镇化发展提出意见和建议。本文通过定量和定性分析,从中心城市作用、非农产业发展、固定资产投资、对外开放、公共卫生服务水平和教育投资方面比较了河南江苏两地就地城镇化动力机制的异同,发现非农产业的发展是推动就地城镇化的根本力量;中心城市对于两地的就地城镇化都有显著的推动作用,江苏省的推动力度大于河南省;增大固定资产的投资比重可以较为显著的推动河南的就地城镇化,但是对江苏各县的影响并不显著;对外开放在江苏省就地城镇化进程中具有显著的作用,在河南省影响不大;最后,改善卫生医疗条件以及增加教育投资都会推动两地的就地城镇化。可以说,河南省就地城镇化的动力更多的来自内部,是依靠自身第二三产业的发展、以及高投资带动的就地城镇化;江苏省的就地城镇化动力则更加的外向和开放,省内中心城市、以及对外开放在其中扮演了更为重要的角色。在内陆地区发展势头加快的宏观大背景下,就地城镇化又出现了一些新的动力。如劳动力回流、沿海产业的梯度转移、以及国家政策的支持。这些因素将给河南的就地城镇化带来新的发展机遇。

【Abstract】 "In situ Urbanization" refers the rural areas complete their urbanization without massive population transfer. In situ Urbanization takes a very important part in China’s urbanization process, it has special economic and social significance for the absorption of surplus rural labor, improving their living standards, expanding domestic demand. Jiangsu and Henan are representative provinces of China’s coastal and inland situ urbanization. In situ urbanization development in Jiangsu Province started earlier, the economic is much stronger and the urbanization and non-agricultural rate are much higher than Henan; While Henan in situ urbanization in recent years shows a trend of accelerated development, the county is getting stronger,the number of towns is increasing, the rate of urbanization and non-agricultural rate is growing fast. Comparing the in situ urbanization of these two provinces will be helpful to have a better understanding of in situ urbanization in developed regions, as well as the dynamic mechanism of the development of in situ urbanization.This article will do some analysis in quantitative and qualitative ways, comparing the similarities and differences between the dynamic mechanism of Henan and Jiangsu’s Urbanization through the indicates of the central cities, the development of non-agricultural industries, investment in fixed assets, opening up the level of public health services and education investments. We found development of non-agricultural industries is the fundamental force of urbanization; central city for both in situ urbanization has a significant role in promoting greater efforts; the increase of investment in fixed assets may be more significant promote in situ urbanization in Henan, but the impact on the Jiangsu’s county is not significant; opening has a significant role in situ urbanization in Jiangsu Province, but has little effect in Henan; Finally, to improve the health and medical conditions as well as increased investment in education will promote both in situ urbanization. It can be said, in situ urbanization in Henan Province gains more power from inner force, and it relies on the development of second and tertiary industries, as well as high investment-driven in situ urbanization; situ urbanization power in Jiangsu Province is more outgoing and open, the central city as well as the opening are playing more important roles.In the macro background with accelerate development in inland area, some new impetus comes to the in situ urbanization of inland areas, such as labor reflux, coastal industrial gradient transfer, and support of national policy. These factors will bring new development opportunities to the situ urbanization of Henan province as well as inland areas.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 复旦大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2016年 03期
  • 【分类号】F299.27
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】290
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络