【作者】 李岩；

【导师】 黄竹胜；

【作者基本信息】 广西师范大学 ， 法律， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 政府律师制度在我国的建立完善,是贯彻实施依法治国基本方略的关键举措,也是当前进一步转变政府机构职能的必要选择。我国的法治政府建设,离不开政府律师有效地参与到政府依法行政的具体环节,这样有助于全面提升政府依法办事的整体水平和社会公众对行政体制运作的公信力。自1995年我国上海浦东新区率先开展政府律师试点工作以来,此后在北京、厦门、扬州等地陆续设立试点,并在整个社会层面都取得了较大的成果与经验。但直到现在,对我国政府律师的规范和指导依然没有具体的法律法规予以明确,这导致其法律地位和资质管理等问题始终处于模糊的界定。另外,由于政府律师制度的设立之初没有妥善地考虑到它与当前的政府法制机构、法律援助部门等体系的衔接问题,以至于各试点地区形成分散、不成熟的形态,甚至引起理论界和实务界对政府律师制度存废与否的质疑。因此,本文从政府律师制度的相关学术分析出发,通过对各地试点工作的对比研究,归纳出我国政府律师制度的现状及存在的问题,并提出具体的完善措施和思路,这对于政府律师法律地位的提升,以及发挥他们对法治政府建设的促进作用,都具有举足轻重的理论价值和现实意义。本文的框架共包括为五个部分,分别对我国政府律师制度的理论研究、运行现状及对策探析等进行了论述。其结构如下：第一章,政府律师制度概述。该部分主要对政府律师的概念、性质做了简要地介绍,并着重分析了政府律师与公职律师、法律援助律师、政府法律顾问等大家容易混淆概念的异同。第二章,构建我国政府律师制度的基础。首先,从法治政府思想和民主行政理论两方面出发,阐述建立我国特色的政府律师制度的宪政理论；其次,从社会主义市场经济发展、律师制度的自身完善、与国际社会接轨的内在需要这三个方面出发,分析我国政府律师制度建构的现实基础。第三章,我国政府律师制度的运行现状及问题分析。挑选出最具有代表性的试点模式,这主要包括厦门模式、扬州模式、广州模式,并通过分析各模式的优缺点,进而总结归纳出目前试点地区所存在的问题和原因。第四章,国外和我国香港地区的关于政府律师制度相对成熟的经验借鉴。主要通过分析美国、新加坡和我国香港地区等这些早已建立此项制度的发展概况及其特征,使之成为进一步完善和推进中国特色政府律师制度的有益借鉴。第五章,我国政府律师制度完善的具体策略。以完善中国政府律师的法律体系、资格授予、监管制度、权责划分以及与行政机构内部和相关部门的协同关系等方面为切入点,提出具体建立中国特色政府律师制度的可行性建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 The well-established system of government lawyers is the important initiatives of government governed by law. It’s also the necessary choice of further promoting administration according to law. Without government lawyers to participate effectively in specific aspects of government administration according to law, the construction of government ruled by law will not be achieved. This will help upgrade the overall level of government administration according to law and the social public to construct the credibility of government. Since 1995, China’s Shanghai Pudong New Area in our country take the lead in carrying out government lawyers pilot work, then in Beijing, Xiamen, Yangzhou and other places have set up the pilot. The greater achievements and experiences have been made in the whole society.But until now, our government lawyer’s specifications and guidance still haven’t been clearly ruled by specific laws and regulations. And this led to their legal status, qualifications of management and other issues have always been a vague definition. In addition, since the beginning of the establishment of the Chinese government lawyers system did not properly take into account the problem of convergence that the current government legal agencies, legal aid system and other systems. Each pilot area to form a dispersed, immature morphology, and even cause the theory and practice for government lawyers questioned whether the abolition of the system. Through the comparison of the experimental work analysis, this article sums up the status quote of China’s government lawyer system and the existing problems, and puts forward some advises and ideas. It has very important theoretical significance and practical significance on effectively playing the role of government lawyers, which is helpful to improve the legal status of government lawyers.This article is divided into five parts to discuss our country government lawyer system existing problems and countermeasures.The first chapter is the overview on government lawyers system. This part makes a presentation of government lawyers’ concept, nature and scope of business. It also analyzes the similarities and differences between government lawyers and public attorneys, legal aid lawyers, government legal advisers and other related concepts.The second chapter is the basic construction of China’s government lawyer system. First of all, from the point of view of the government under the rule of law theory and the theory of democratic administration, this paper expounds the construction of China’s government lawyer system of constitutional theory. Secondly, from the socialist market economy’s development, the lawyer’s own sound system and the integration of the internal needs of the international community these three angles, analysis the realistic basis for constructing China’s government lawyer system.The third chapter is the analysis of Chinese government lawyer system’s status quo, problems and causes. It focuses on the typical pattern of Xiamen, Yangzhou mode, Guangzhou mode in our country and these advantages and disadvantages. It also analyzes the problems and causes existing in the pilot areas.The fourth chapter is the reference of government lawyer system in foreign and Hongkong region of China. This article selects and analyzes government lawyers system and its characteristic in the United States, Singapore and China’s Hongkong region. Take it as reference to construct and perfect our country government lawyer system.The fifth chapter is the perfect Countermeasures of our country government lawyer system. From China’s government lawyer system perfection of legislation, granting, management mechanism, government lawyers’ rights and obligations, and the government agencies within the relevant departments of the relationship and other aspects, this article proposes specific countermeasures to construct government lawyer system with Chinese characteristics.更多还原