【作者】 李刚；

【导师】 康娜；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 随着我国社会经济的不断发展,民事诉讼中虚假诉讼行为频频发生,从沿海到内陆省份虚假诉讼案件所涉及的地域不断扩大,发现的案件数量一直增长,而民间借贷则成了虚假诉讼的高发之地。虚假诉讼的研究在当前处于初始阶段,相关理论、制度规范正在探索之中。本文主要对民间借贷虚假诉讼的现状、概念、特征、危害、成因等几个方面进行了探讨,在此基础上对防范和规制民间借贷虚假诉讼提出了一些浅显的意见,总共用四个部分进行论述。第一部分对民间借贷虚假诉讼进行概述。在民间借贷虚假诉讼的现状分析之上,通过比较学者意见和一些地方性相关规定,界定了虚假诉讼及民间借贷虚假诉讼的概念。并对实践中民间借贷虚假诉讼常有的特征进行了梳理。第二部分阐述民间借贷虚假诉讼的危害及成因。民间借贷虚假诉讼产生的巨大危害主要表现在两个方面：一是影响司法权威、浪费司法资源；二是侵害他人利益。对其成因则从内因和外因两个角度进行分析,区分为法院内部原因和法院外部原因,然后就两大方面的原因逐一展开论述。第三部分对当前司法实践中应对虚假诉讼的情况作了说明。一方面是依据现有法律规范的一般性处理方法,一方面是不同地方结合本地区实际情况制定的地方性规范,通过探讨这些方法、措施的可取之处,希望能对民间借贷虚假诉讼的防治有所借鉴和完善。第四部分论述民间借贷虚假诉讼的防治措施。在民间借贷虚假诉讼的成因分析之上,借鉴现有的理论研究成果和实践经验,从法院内部与外部两个方向进行着手,结合实体法和程序法,提出了规制民间借贷虚假诉讼的建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the continuous development of our society and economy, civil action lawsuit false behavior occur frequently, from the coastal regions to inland provinces false litigation involved expanding the number of cases has been found to grow, while private loans have become false lawsuit high land. False litigation in the current study in the initial stage, the relevant theories, rules and norms are being explored. This paper focuses on several aspects of the status quo of private lending false lawsuit, concepts, features, hazards, causes were discussed, on this basis, for the prevention and regulation of private lending lawsuit made some plain false opinions with a total of four parts exposition.The first part is an overview of private lending sham litigation. Situation on private lending false litigation analysis by comparing the views of scholars and some local regulations, defines the concept of private lending false false lawsuit and litigation. Private lending practices and false litigation often features a comb.The second part describes the private lending false causes harm and litigation. Private lending generated enormous harm false lawsuits mainly in two aspects:First, the impact of the judicial authority, waste of judicial resources; the second is against the interests of others. From both internal and external perspectives to their cause analysis, the District Court is divided into internal and external causes of the reasons the court, after two terms on the reasons one by one to start on.The third part of the current judicial practice to deal with bogus lawsuits explained. On the one hand is based on the existing legal norms of the general approach, on the one hand with the actual situation in different parts of the region to develop local norms, by exploring these methods, measures of merit, hope can prevent false lawsuits against private lending some learn and improve.Section IV discusses the prevention of false private lending litigation. Causes of private lending over false lawsuit, to draw on existing theoretical research and practical experience, were working from inside and outside the court in two directions, combining substantive and procedural law, suggestions regulation of private lending false litigation.更多还原