【作者】 张彩霞；

【导师】 孙玉芝；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 随着社会经济的快速发展,交易形式的多元化,纵向垄断行为也越来越多发。存在认定难、举证难、执法人员专业素质不高、处罚力度不够等问题。本文从实践角度出发,对上述几个问题进行了论述。纵向垄断协议法律明确规定的有两种类型,对此法条做了列举式的规定。本文第一部分首先介绍了纵向垄断协议的概念、特点和它的类型。法律规定的类型有固定向第三人转售商品的价格、限定向第三人转售商品的最低价格。理论界根据这两种特定的类型,又把纵向垄断协议具体分为三种。本文在讲述纵向垄断协议的类型时,又对纵向垄断协议的认定做了简单的介绍。之后就说明了纵向垄断协议对经济社会的双重影响。表明消极影响,是为了说明现阶段对纵向垄断协议规制的必要性和迫切性。对于一个问题的解决,我们要实事求是的了解他的现状,就像解决一个案件要了解它的案件事实一样,所以本文论述了纵向垄断协议现阶段的事实问题,即现状。通过对现状的分析,我们就可以发现现阶段纵向垄断协议在实践中存在的问题很多,首先是源头上的问题,即立法层面的问题。其次是在司法实践中存在的主要问题,即对证据的收集和认定,还有证明责任的分配。要想对纵向垄断协议进行规制,就先要认定这是一个纵向垄断协议,这是需要大量证据来证明的,但我国现阶段在认定纵向垄断协议方面,有关证据的规定还比较少,内容单一不完善。我国在纵向垄断协议方面的法律规定较少,但国外对此有许多值得我们学习和借鉴的比较有成效的规定,本文主要罗列了几个典型的国家,比如美国、德国等经济发达国家,通过对国外有关规定的了解,我们可以根据我国的实际情况,借鉴国外的规定,制定出比较适合我们国家的规制方式。本文第四部分就针对本文前面提到的问题,对症下药的提出了完善的建议,完善措施是一种自上而下的完善,首先从源头上解决立法问题,接下来就是司法方面的完善了。只有完善这些不足之后,才能有效的规制纵向垄断协议。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the rapid development of social economy, trading in the form of diversification, vertical monopolistic behavior more and more hair. Identified the presence of hard, hard evidence, not clear division of labor between law enforcement agencies, law enforcement personnel professional quality is not high, punishment is not enough other issues. In this paper, starting from an actual case, leads to vertical monopoly agreements, and several issues discussed above. Vertical monopoly agreements specified by law, there are two types of this statute made provisions enumerated type.The first part of this paper introduces the concept of vertical monopoly agreements, features and its type. Type of law has a fixed price for resale to a third person, the third person limited to the minimum resale price. According to this theory two specific types, again divided into three specific vertical monopoly agreements. This article describes when the type of vertical monopoly agreements, but also to identify vertical monopoly agreements made a brief introduction. After it shows the double impact of vertical monopoly agreements on economic and social development. Shows that the negative impact is to explain to the vertical monopoly agreements regulating the necessity and urgency at this stage. To solve a problem, we have to be realistic understanding of his situation, just to solve one case to understand the facts of the case it’s the same, so this paper discusses the issues of fact at this stage of vertical monopoly agreements, namely the status quo.Through analysis of the current situation, we can find at this stage vertical monopoly agreements in practice many of the problems, the first is the source of the problem, namely the problem of the legislative level. Second is the main problem in the judicial practice, that evidence collection and identification, as well as proof of assignment of responsibility. Vertical monopoly agreements in order to regulate, it must first be determined that a vertical monopoly agreements, which requires a lot of evidence to prove that, but at this stage in our country finds vertical monopoly agreements, the provisions of the relevant evidence is still relatively small, the content of a single imperfect.In terms of our law less vertical monopoly agreements, but this has much abroad and learn from our comparison of effective regulations, this paper lists several typical of countries such as the United States, Germany and other developed countries, through understanding of the relevant provisions of the foreign countries, we can according to China’s actual situation, learn from the provisions of foreign countries, to develop more suitable way to regulate our country. In this paper, the fourth part of the problem mentioned earlier in this article, made a perfect remedy proposal, a top-down measures to improve the sound, the first legislation to solve the problem at the source, the next step is to improve the administration of justice. Only after complete these deficiencies in order to effectively regulate vertical monopoly agreements.更多还原