【作者】 石岩；

【导师】 贺恒扬；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 简化诉讼程序,提高诉讼效率是当今世界各国司法改革中民事诉讼改革的发展趋势。小额诉讼程序因其低成本、高效率解决纠纷的特性,顺应了这一趋势,而为世界各国所采用。在我国,随着经济的飞速发展,公民法律意识的增强,对于司法的需求与日俱增,但我国现行法律对此并没有积极回应,尤其是是对小额纠纷的解决更缺乏相应的制度。鉴于此,我国顺应国际趋势,并结合本国实际,在2012修订的《民事诉讼法》中增设小额诉讼程序,使得小额纠纷的解决在我国实现了有法可依。并于2015年重新修改了《民事诉讼法解释》,为小额诉讼程序的具体适用提供依据。本文主要内容包括对小额诉讼程序基本理论的论述,对具有代表性的国家和地区的小额诉讼程序立法的比较分析,重点阐述我国小额诉讼程序的现行立法,即上文所提到的最新修改的法律及司法解释,以及近几年我国小额诉讼程序的司法运行状况,肯定其可取之处并指出其中的不足,最后提出完善建议。本文的目的旨在通过分析我国现行小额诉讼程序的立法及司法运行状况,发现其中所存在的问题,并在借鉴其他国家或地区的先进经验和结合我国具体国情的基础之上,对其加以完善,以期我国小额诉讼程序在以后能够更加良好的运行。本文研究方法包括比较分析法,归纳总结法和历史分析法等。本文得出下述结论:我国小额诉讼程序在立法上的某些规定相对科学、合理并有可取之处,司法运行中也体现出其高效、便捷解决纠纷的优势,但总体上该程序在我国确立时间短暂,立法不完善的地方还很多,诸如当事人选择权、执行、救济等问题依然存在,司法运行中也存在适用率较低、当事人认同度低等问题,我国小额诉讼程序的发展和完善仍然各方的共同努力。更多还原

【Abstract】 Simplify procedure, improve the efficiency of lawsuit is the world development trend of the reform of the judicial reform in civil litigation. Small litigation procedure because of its low cost, high efficiency characteristics of the dispute resolution, complied with the trend, and for use by countries around the world. with the rapid development of economy in our country, people’s legal consciousness enhancement, the increasing demand for justice, but no positive response in the current law, especially for more small the settlement of the dispute is the lack of corresponding system. In view of this, comply with the international trend in our country, and combining with its practice, in the 2012 revision of the civil procedure law, add a small procedure to solve by dispute implements laws in our country. And in 2015, to modify the interpretation of the civil procedure law, provide the basis for small litigation procedure shall be applicable to the specific.In this paper, the main contents include the basic theories of small procedure, the representative countries and regions, small litigation procedure legislation of comparative analysis, emphasis on current legislation of our country small procedure, that is mentioned above, the latest modification of law and judicial interpretation, and small litigation procedure in our country’s judicial status, in recent years, affirms its merit and points out the shortcomings and improving Suggestions finally.The purpose of this article aims to analyze the current legislative and judicial status of small procedure, find out the existing problems, and draw lessons from the advanced experience of other countries or regions, and combining with China’s specific national conditions, it is perfect, so as to our country small litigation procedure can run better later.In this paper, research methods including comparative analysis, sum up method and historical analysis method, etc.This paper draws the following conclusion: certain rules of small litigation procedure in legislation in our country is relatively scientific, reasonable and has merit, also reflects the operation of the judicial its advantage of high efficiency, convenient to solve disputes but overall the program established in our country time is short and has many imperfect legislation, such as the choice, execution, relief and other issues still exist, there are also applicable in the operation of the judicial rate is low, the parties were low, the development and perfection of China’s small procedure still joint efforts of all parties concerned.更多还原