菏泽市城市边缘社区治理研究

【作者】 李姗姗；

【导师】 曲延春；

【作者基本信息】 山东师范大学 ， 公共管理（专业学位）， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 城市边缘社区是我国城市化进程中产生的新型社区类型。改革开放30多年来，随着我国经济的快速发展和社会的全面进步，我国的城市化水平稳步提高，尤其是在我国的中东部地区，城市化以空前的速度扩张，地处城市边缘的农村社区逐渐被纳入城市圈的范围之内。城市边缘社区的是农村城市化、城市扩张而催生的必然产物，是中国城市化过程中普遍存在的社区类型，具有巨大的发展潜力和广阔前景。这类社区地处城市边缘区域，结构和特征介于城市和农村之间，是处于城乡结合区的由农民、本地居民和外来流动人口构成的社会生活共同体。目前我国城市社区管理体系不成熟、不完善，城市边缘社一方面发展迅速，活力最强，另一方面，矛盾集中，问题复杂，其发展状况直接影响着城市的发展和安全稳定，社区治理研究越来越受到关注。我国国民经济和社会发展第十二个五年规划纲要中提出“坚持多方参与、共同治理，统筹兼顾、动态协调的原则，完善社会管理格局，创新社会管理机制”；十八大报告明确指出，“在城乡社区治理、基层公共事务和公益事业”中实行“群众自我管理、自我服务、自我教育、自我监督，增强城乡社区服务功能，强化农村、城市社区党组织建设”。这些重要的报告和决定给完善社区治理工作提供了政策依据和发展方向。本文以治理理论为基础，阐述了社区治理的内涵，文章根据菏泽市的政治、经济和社会发展现状，分析了菏泽市在城市边缘社区治理中出现的如政府管理错位缺失、社区内源动力不足、社区建设服务滞后等问题的表现形式并剖析其产生根源。选取了菏泽市三个典型的街道办事处的社区治理方式进行分析，并从国内先进的治理模式中总结经验，最后对菏泽市城市边缘社区治理提出了政府主导、居民自治、非政府组织参与的多元化治理模式。即：创新社区服务，建立社区服务平台；充分发挥政府在社区治理中的主导作用，要从思想上高度重视社区建设，建立职能部门社区建设联席制度，并加大财政对社区建设的扶持力度；实现政府与非政府组织在社区治理中的良性互动，使非政府公共组织的管理和监督走向规范化、制度化；提高社区居民参与程度，落实社区自治权力，培养社区参与意识，推广社区直选，扩大居民参与渠道。更多还原

【Abstract】 The city fringe areais the new type community as the outcome of the chiniese urbannization.30years after the reform and opening, the urbanizational level is increasing steadily as thecomprehensive progress and rapid development of economic and social done in China.Especiallly in the middle and east part of Chinia, the urbanization is spreading in aunprecedented speed, therefore the rural communities are being included in the city circle.Thecity fringe area is the inevitable outcome of the rural urbanization and the urban sprawl. As acommon type of the community, the city fringe area has huge development potential and broadprospects. This kind of community is located in the urban fringe area with the structrure andcharacteristics between the urban and the rural areas, and it is kind of social life communityformed by the farmers, local residents and floating population. Due to the immature and faultyurban community management system, the urban fringe areas are the rapidly developing,mostdynamic, contradictions and with complex geographical problems, the development quality andeffectiveness of urban fringe communities affects the security and stability of the city,community government study get more and more attention.China National Economic and SocialDevelopment Twelfth Five-Year Plan Outline has mentioned:‘adhere to multi-stakeholderinvolvement, shared governance, integrated, dynamic principles of coordination, improve socialmanagement pattern, the innovation of social management mechanism.’18th CPC NationalCongress states that:‘Masses of self-management, self-service, self-education, self-monitoring,enhance urban and rural community services, strengthen rural, urban community partybuilding’should be done in the‘Governance in urban and rural communities, grassroots publicaffairs and public welfare’. These important reports and decisions provide policy basis anddevelopment direction and set off a new unprecedented new thinking in terms of objectives,approaches, and ultimately, aiming to improve the community,.The paper has analyzed the manifestations and causes of problems such as Lack ofgovernment management of dislocation, lack of motivation within the community source,community-building services lag in the city fringe area, based on the understanding of the Homeand Abroad Governance.At first the general situation of governance is analyzed, then the paperanalyzes the development status of Heze City community and summerizes the success ofcommunity govern scheme of three typically street offices. The paper also summerizes theexperience advanced domestic governance model. Occuring to the status of political, economicand social development in Heze, the diversification of governance including the government-led,resident autonomy, NGO involvement is proposed. At the same time, the paper proposes clear thinking to achieve the model: Giving full play to the leading role of government in communitygovernance, paying great attention to communiy building, building a community developmentco-system functions, and increasing financial support for community-building efforts; achievingpositive interaction between the government and NGO community governance, so that themanagement and supervision of non-governmental public organizations can be of standardizationand institutionalization; improving the degree of community participation in the implementationof community autonomy, cultivating awareness of community participation, promotingcommunity elections, and expanding channels for residents to participate.更多还原