节点文献

亦庄开发区工业企业安全生产分级评定及监管研究

Study on Industrial Enterprise Safety Assessment and Graded Regulatory Classification of BDA

【作者】 赵伟

【导师】 周艳玲; 蒋立涛;

【作者基本信息】 北京化工大学 , 项目管理(专业学位), 2014, 硕士

【摘要】 在“安全第一、预防为主、综合治理”的安全方针指导下,我国的安全生产水平有了稳步的提高,企业的安全条件不断改善,安全投入不断增加,主要负责人的履职能力不断增强,生产安全事故起数不断减少,人员死亡总数逐年降低,安全生产状况逐年好转。然而由于我国的安全生产工作起步较晚,安全科技水平较低,人员素质参差不齐,安全意识不强,监管力量薄弱,“我要安全”的安全氛围还未形成,我国每年的生产安全事故总量依然偏大,死亡人员依然众多,而且时常有重特大事故发生,安全生产形势仍然十分严峻。同样,亦庄开发区也面临企业多、生产形势多样、监管力量薄弱的问题。由于对企业的安全管理水平无量化的指标,致使监管没有针对性,造成了人力、物力、财力的巨大浪费,极大地降低了监管效率。解决上述问题需要一个长期、复杂的过程,解决的关键是参照西方发达国家安全生产管理经验,走出原始、粗放、被动的监管格局,创建企业自我管理体制,建立政府分级监管模式。基于上述原因,亦庄开发区安监局引入风险管理思想,提出对工业企业进行分级评定,并根据分级评定的结果进行分级监管。分级监管的前提是构建分级评定模型,对企业进行分级。通过运用文献研究法、经验总结法、德尔菲法和定量分析方法确定了评定模型的架构、评定项目的权重和扣分标准。该模型满分1000分,分为安全生产基础管理、安全生产现场管理、职业健康管理三部分,涉及五个A级评定项目,11个B级评定项目。亦庄开发区安监局委第三方中介机构,依据评定模型,对344家工业企业进行了评定分级,其中A级单位15家,B级单位173家,C级单位136家,D级单位20家。亦庄开发区安监局根据工业企业安全生产等级的不同,综合运用不同的监管措施,如不同级别企业的差异化监管措施、单项得分较低企业的精细化监管措施、升降级动态监管措施等,取得了政府监管效率明显提高、企业安全管理水平显著提升,隐患排查治理力度不断增强、安全投入不断增加、安全监管人员素质明显提升的显著效果,实现了安全监管的差异化、精细化和专业化,初步形成了督导有序、重点突出的安全监管体系。

【Abstract】 Under the "safety first, prevention, comprehensive treatment" security policy guidance, our production level has been steadily improving safety, corporate security conditions continue to improve, increasing investment in safety, the main person responsible for the ability to continue to perform their duties enhanced safety of accidents declining, reducing the total number of persons killed every year, year after year to improve safety conditions。 However, because of the late start of production safety, lower security level of technology, uneven quality of personnel, security awareness is not strong, weak supervision,"I want security," the security environment has not yet formed, China’s annual production safety accidents the total is still too large, the deaths are still numerous, and often serious accidents have occurred, production safety situation is still very grim。 Similarly, the BDA also facing businesses and more diverse production situation, weak regulatory issues。 Because of the safety management level of non-quantifiable indicators, resulting in no specific regulation, resulting in a huge waste of manpower, material and financial resources, greatly reducing the efficiency of supervision cSolve these problems requires a long, complicated process, the key to solving the reference Western security management experience developed countries, out of the original, extensive, passive regulatory landscape, create enterprise self-management system, establish a government classification regulation mode. For these reasons, the introduction of BDA innings risk management ideas proposed classification of industrial enterprises assessed and graded according to the results of the regulatory classification assessment。The premise is to build a hierarchical classification regulatory assessment model, the enterprise classification. Through the use of literature research, lessons learned, Delphi method and quantitative analysis method to determine the structure of the assessment model, the right to re-assess the project and the standard deduction。 The model is total of1000points, divided into basic safety management, site management of production safety, occupational health management three large, involving five A-level assessment project and11B-class assessment project。 BDA innings appoint a third-party intermediaries, according to the assessment model, the344industrial enterprises were assessed classification, where Class A units15, B-level units173, C-level units136, D-level units20。Depending innings industrial enterprise safety production level, the integrated use of different regulatory measures, such as different levels of regulatory measures differentiated business, fine individual score lower corporate regulatory measures, the relegation dynamic regulatory measures, the government has made regulatory efficiency significantly improve enterprise security management significantly improved, hidden investigation and management efforts have been enhanced, security continues to increase, safety supervision personnel quality improved significantly significant effect, to achieve a safety regulatory differences, fine and professional goals。

节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络