【作者】 王平；

【导师】 施鹏鹏；

【作者基本信息】 西南政法大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2014， 硕士

【摘要】 随着迅速出警机制的建立和社区管理的不断完善，我国破获的现行犯案件数量日益增加，现行犯案件在案件总量中的比例持续攀升。我国针对现行犯案件并未规定特别的处理程序，针对现行犯案件仍然使用普通程序处理。实践中被羁押的犯罪嫌疑人即使是证据充分、案件轻微的现行犯，对其长期羁押的现象仍然十分常见。这不仅不利于对犯罪嫌疑人的人权保护，也不利于案件得到及时有效的处理。在这种大背景下，对于现行犯案件适用特别处理程序尤为必要。我国现行的刑事诉讼法规定了对于现行犯可以适用先行拘留的几种情形，但是法律并未明确规定现行犯的概念，这导致实践中对于现行犯案件确立标准和适用范围的混乱。纵观世界各国法律，许多国家的法律都明确界定了现行犯的内涵，并针对现行犯案件适用迅速审判的处理程序。由于现行犯案件有着不同于普通刑事案件的特点，这类案件一般犯罪事实清楚、证据较为充分，因此再对现行犯案件适用普通程序处理明显不符合诉讼效率的价值目标，也不利于对犯罪嫌疑人的人权保护。鉴于此，我国有必要借鉴国外对于现行犯立法的先进经验，确立我国现行犯案件的特别处理程序。在构建现行犯案件速决程序的过程中，应注意我国特有的违法行为追诉机制的影响，以及速决程序是否有违无罪推定原则。本文首先介绍了我国现行法律对于现行犯的规定及存在的问题，随后借鉴国外对于现行犯的立法经验，确立了自己对于现行犯概念的界定。其次对现行犯诉讼程序的历史发展进行了梳理，并对几个国家的现行犯处理程序进行了比较研究。再次针对我国现行犯案件的处理现状进行了评价和总结。最后提出了如何构建我国现行犯案件的处理程序，以及构建过程中应注意的问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the rapid alert mechanism for the continuous improvement and theestablishment of community-based management, the number of cases of flagrantedelicto cracked increasing proportion of the total cases of flagrante delicto casescontinues to rise. For the case of flagrante delicto does not provide special handlingprocedures are still using normal procedures for handling cases of flagrante delicto. Inpractice the suspect in custody even sufficient evidence, the case of flagrante delictoslight, its long-term detention of the phenomenon is still very common. This is notonly conducive to the protection of human rights of criminal suspects, the case is notconducive to timely and effective treatment. In this backdrop, the case of flagrantedelicto apply for special handling procedures particularly necessary.The current provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure of several scenarioscan be applied for the first detained in flagrante delicto, but the law does not specifythe concept of flagrante delicto, which led to the practice of establishing standards forcases of flagrante delicto and scope of confusion. Throughout the world the laws, thelaws of many countries have clearly defined the meaning of flagrante delicto, andcases of flagrante delicto applies for speedy trial process. As the case of flagrantedelicto with characteristics different from ordinary criminal cases, such cases aregenerally criminal facts are clear, the evidence more fully, so then apply the ordinaryprocedure for handling cases of flagrante delicto value target is obviously notconsistent with the procedural efficiency, is not conducive to criminal suspectsprotection of human rights. In view of this, China should learn from foreign advancedexperience in flagrante delicto for legislation to establish a special case of flagrantedelicto process.In the process of building a quick decision procedure in cases of flagrante delicto,should pay attention to the impact of specific offenses prosecution mechanisms andprocedures are quick decision contrary to the presumption of innocence. This paper describes the provisions of the existing legislation and problems of flagrante delicto,and then learn from foreign experience in flagrante delicto for legislation, establishinghis own definition of the concept of flagrante delicto. Secondly, the historicaldevelopment of flagrante delicto proceedings of the sort, and several countries inflagrante delicto handlers were compared. Again, the status of China’s handling ofcases of flagrante delicto were evaluated and summarized. Finally, how to build a caseof flagrante delicto process, as well as the build process should pay attention to.更多还原