【作者】 张巍；

【导师】 傅穹；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 法律， 2014， 硕士

【摘要】 近年来，我国经济迅猛发展，公民思想观念,尤其是价值观念发生着巨变，法律意识逐渐觉醒，愈发重视对于个人利益的保障，依法维权的社会氛围愈加浓厚。就诉讼领域而言，我国公民已经完成了由“厌讼”、“无讼”到“好讼”、“滥讼”的颠覆性转变。近十年来，我国法院受理的案件数量呈直线上升，俨然成为“诉讼爆炸”的时代。作为一名深处于“诉讼爆炸”时代的基层民事法官，笔者在见证我国公民法律意识显著提高，懂得用法律武器保护其合法权益的同时，也亲历了一些所谓的“知法者”违背法律精神，恶意串通，采取虚构法律关系、捏造案件事实等方式，诱导法院作出错误裁判，获取不法利益的虚假民事诉讼。法院是司法实践的直接阵地，最容易发现立法和司法实践中存在的问题，笔者就虚假民事诉讼这一课题，在所工作的辽宁省基层法院进行调研，调研对象为从事民商事审判5年以上的10名民事法官，其中有8人表示遇到过虚假民事诉讼案件，有7人表示近年来此类案件数量有所上升。虚假诉讼在司法实践中呈现出“燎原”之势，这与民事诉讼定纷止争的价值定位相背离，破坏了正常的诉讼秩序，占用了本就稀缺的司法资源，损害了案外人的合法权益，最严重的是其使法院和法官成为侵害他人合法权益的工具，使公民对司法机关的公正性、公信力产生怀疑。虚假诉讼是司法实践中一颗迅速膨胀的毒瘤，严重危害到了司法的权威性及公信力，已经到了必须拔除的阶段。虚假诉讼与目前多数学者研究的恶意诉讼、诉讼欺诈在概念上既有重叠又有区别，虚假诉讼把国家的司法活动作为为其获得非法利益的“工具”来使用，是对我国司法公正性、权威性的公然挑战，社会危害远大于其他滥用诉权行为。民事、行政、刑事领域都存在虚假诉讼现象，其中虚假民事诉讼尤为泛滥，本文仅以虚假民事诉讼研究为限，以一则审判实践中遇到的案例引出虚假民事诉讼概念，对虚假民事诉讼与恶意诉讼、诉讼欺诈等相关概念进行辨析，归纳出虚假民事诉讼的特征及实践中如何甄别，并在对虚假民事诉讼案件进行实证分析的基础上，提出规制虚假民事诉讼的对策，以期最大限度的遏制虚假诉讼。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years, with development of China’s economy, thoughts of citizen,especially the values are undergone great changes, and the awareness of law are alsogradually awakened. What’s more, citizens increasingly attach importance to theprotection of personal interests, and a increasingly strong social atmosphere ofsupporting rights by law is formed. In terms of litigation system, Chinese citizenshave completed the disruptive change from Litigation Aversion, No Litigation, toLitigious and Excessive Litigation. Over the past decade, the number of case beforethe court is of linear upward, and a era of Litigation Explosion is coming. As agrassroots civil judge in the era of litigation explosion, the writer has witnessed thecitizen’s consciousness of law increasing significantly and they becoming using legalweapon to protect their legitimate rights and interests. At the same time, there is sucha phenomenon that some of so-called the person, who knows the law are against thespirit of the law to take malicious collusion, adopt the fictitious legal relationship,and fabricate the case facts. They try to make the court make a wrong judgment,mediation or execution, so as to obtain false civil litigation of illegal interests. Courtis the forefront of judicial practice, where the problems in legislative and judicialpractice can be easily found. In terms of the False Civil Litigation, the writerinvestigates the grassroots Court of Liaoning Province, the research object includes10civil judges working in civil and commercial matters more than5years, there areeight person who said they have encountered false civil litigation cases, and sevenperson said the number of such cases has increased a lot in recent years. FalseLitigation spreading through the juridical practice is depart from value orientationwhich settles conflict in Civil Litigation, and it has disturbed normal judicial order,wasted the pretty infrequent judicial resources, and infringed lawful right ansinterests of an outside in the case, the most serious is making court and judgebecome tools to infringe other lawful right and interests, hence the impartiality andcredibility of judicial authority are doubt by civics. False Litigation is like barnyard grasses in the judicial field, which has became a harmful weed endangering justiceseedlings, and it must be get rid of. False Litigation is common as well as differentfrom concept of Malicious Litigation and Litigation Fraud which are researched bymost scholars currently. The behavior of False Litigation challenging judicialimpartiality and seriousness publicly makes native judicial activities as a tool to getillegal interests, and its social damage is more than other behaviors abusing litigationright. False Litigation appeared in the area of civil, criminal and administration, ofwhich Civil False Litigation is particularly rampant. This paper only focuses on CivilFalse Litigation, by introducing the definition of False Litigation and comparingthe abuse of litigation such as False Litigation, Litigation Fraud and MaliciousLitigation, to summarize the characters of False Litigation and the ways to identifyin practice. And on the basis of analyzing Civil False Litigation cases,countermeasures to regulate Civil False Litigation will be put forward to curb FalseLitigation furthest.更多还原