【作者】 张磊；

【导师】 张善燚；

【作者基本信息】 中南大学 ， 法律， 2014， 硕士

【摘要】 摘要：实物证据是否具有证据能力、能否提交到法庭,并由法官对其证明力进行评判,直接涉及到刑事诉讼打击犯罪与保障人权两大价值目标的冲突,这对我国的法治建设有着非常重大的意义,因而其也成为诉讼法理论界关注的焦点。由于社会发展水平,法律文化传统以及国家对刑事诉讼目的理解的不同,世界各国对非法实物证据的证据能力的问题的规定也不尽相同,实际上同一国家在不同历史阶段对该问题的处理都是不完全相同的。随着2010年我国两高三部《两个证据规定》的出台,我国确立了非法证据的排除规则。2012年3月全国人大审议通过了《刑事诉讼法修正案》,这标志着我国以法律的形式将非法证据排除规则正式确立下来。但是我国在这方面的规定正处于探索阶段,所以还存在这许多不完善的地方。基于此,笔者希望通过对该制度的研究,发现其不足之处,并提出相关的完善建议。我国目前对于非法证据排除的规定主要是在非法言辞证据的领域,对于非法实物证据的排除规则更是少之又少,本文首先对非法实物证据排除进行了概念上的界定,在明白了概念之后,通过对美国、英国、德国、日本等国在这方面规定的分析,整理出非法实物证据排除建立的价值博弈。在对我国现阶段有关实物证据排除规则的现状分析之后,得出我国相关规定的不足之处,然后在最后一章提出了完善之策。更多还原

【Abstract】 Abstract:Whether the evidence of physical evidences can be submitted to the court to be judged its probative force directly related to the two value targets of fighting against crime and the protection of human rights, this has a very significant meaning for our country, and thus has become the focus of the procedural theory study. Due to the level of social development, the different legal and cultural traditions and national understanding of the purpose of the criminal proceedings, the exclusionary rule of illegal physical evidence in the world are not the same, in fact, the same country in different historical stages rule for this problem is not identical-With the introduction "the two rules of evidence" in2010, our country established the illegal evidence exclusion rules. March2012National People’s Congress passed the "Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment", which marks the legal form of the exclusionary rule would formalize down. However, our provisions in this regard is in the exploration stage, so there are so many imperfections in it. Based on this, I hope to find its deficiencies and make relevant recommendations by studying the rule system.At present, the exclusion of illegal evidences in our country focus on the area of oral evidences, for the exclusion of physical evidence are fewer. By understanding the concept of illegal evidence exclusion, then by analysis of the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan and other countries in this regard required, sorting out the exclusion of illegal physical evidence to establish the value of the game. After studying by the exclusionary rule of illegal physical evidence at this stage, find out the problems and in the last chapter I presents the solution strategy.更多还原