节点文献

惯习与空间—新型城镇化安置小区公共空间的研究

Habitus and Space-the Public Space Research on New Urbanization Resettlement Community

【作者】 李锋

【导师】 贾新锋; 倪梁峰;

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 , 建筑与土木工程(专业学位), 2014, 硕士

【摘要】 现在中国大多数城市的主要元素之一是笔直开敞的街道,千篇一律的大体量城市住宅自由的散布在公园化的城市空间中。城市空间概念化的地图中呈现出均匀的质感,没有对比、层级、缺乏组织结构。在城镇化过程中城市边缘的许多村落正在消失,拆迁安置小区的规划依旧延续或者抄袭现代城市规划的范本。住宅小区中具有空间组织秩序的街道及广场已经不复存在,各个层级的空间在住宅小区的楼与楼之间零散的拼凑在一起,空间的层次已经消失殆尽。推进新型城镇化,不能盲目复制国外规划设计模式,而是要传承自身的文脉,重塑自身的文化地域特色。没有自己的文化根基,创造不出自己的特色,自身优势就发挥不出来,就会造成千城一面的景象。城镇化过程中城市边缘的拆迁安置居住小区割裂式的设计,缺失了很多中国文化和思想内涵,这种粗暴的规划设计必然隐藏着种种缺陷。安置小区居民的归属感、领域感的缺失不仅仅在物质上清晰的表现出来,同样也表现在精神文化需求上面。在列斐伏尔看来空间也是可以生产的,空间的生产把物质和精神二元的相互对立的两个因素结合起来。空间的生产,不仅仅是物质性的生产,也受到文化、惯习、历史等因素的影响。在社会实践中布尔迪厄将习性、场域和资本做为相互作用的因素同时考虑。中国城镇化的浪潮中,城市的边缘是社会实践和空间生产的主要场所,在这里具有中国文化根基的村落逐渐消失,农民搬迁进安置小区,他们从农民突然转变为城镇居民的不适应性表现的愈加明显。安置小区的公共空间作为居民日常生活的空间载体,居民的日常活动和基本交往在此进行。小区公共空间应延续村落的空间层次,让小区有明确的地域性;应延续中国村落居民的人文情感和风俗习惯,适应居民现代的生活方式。拆迁安置小区的适应性设计同时应该结合现代城市的社会、经济、文化等因素,对原村落中的受自然条件和人文条件影响形成的空间进行借鉴和延续,进而对小区公共空间进行转译和重组,满足现代居民的日常生活需求。

【Abstract】 Currently, the open and straight street is playing as an important element in mostChinese cities. The amount of resemble urban houses freely spread in the gardeningurban space. The uniform texture is showed in the map of conceptual urban space,and there are no comparison, level and organization structure. Many urban marginalvillages are going to disappear during the process of urbanization. The sample ofmodern urban planning is still continued and plagiarized on the planning ofresettlement residential quarter. The orderly spatial street and plaza are no longer exitin the residential quarter. Different level spaces are pieced together between buildingsin the residential quarter, and the level of space has disappeared already.Promoting new style urbanization should not blindly copy the foreign mode, butinherit our own context and remold our own regional culture features. Features cannotbe created, if our own advantages cannot be developed. And thousands cities willhave one appearance without own culture foundation. During the process ofurbanization, separate style design on the resettlement residential quarter of urbanfringe lack a lot of Chinese culture and ideological connotation. And kinds ofshortcomings mush be hiding in such roughly planning design. The lack of sense ofbelonging and field of resettlement residents is not only displaying on the substancebut also on the spiritual and cultural.In Lefebvre’s eyes, space can be produced, and two opposite factors of substanceand spiritual can be combined by the space of production. The production of space isnot only the production of substance, but also influenced by the culture,habit,historyand so on. In social practice, habit, regional and capital are considered at the sametime as the interaction by Bourdieu. In the tide of Chinese urbanization, urban fringeof city is the main places of social practice and production. Villages with Chineseculture foundation are slowly going to disappear right now. Farmers are moving toresentment residential quarter, and the performance of non-adaptive shows moreobvious since they translated to urban residents from farmer. The public space of resettlement quarter is becoming the carrier of normal life of residents, and normalactive and basic communication of residents are taken here. The village levels andhuman emotion as well as customs should be continued in the public space ofresidential quarter, so as to let the district has a clear regional and let residents adaptmodern lifestyle. The adaptive design of resettlement quarters should combine themodern city factors, such as social, economic, culture and so on. The becoming spacein the original villages influenced by nature conditions and human conditions shouldbe refered and continued. In addition, the space of quarters need to be transferred andrecombined to meet the requirements of normal life of modern residents.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 郑州大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2015年 03期
  • 【分类号】TU984.12
  • 【被引频次】14
  • 【下载频次】569
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络