【作者】 胡玮；

【导师】 陈立言；

【作者基本信息】 广西大学 ， 思想政治教育， 2014， 硕士

【摘要】 传播大师麦克卢汉曾提出：“媒介是社会发展的基本动力,也是区分不同社会形态的标志,每一种新媒介的产生与运用,宣告我们进入了一个新的时代”。以微博、微信为代表的社会化媒体的发展,传统媒体所垄断的话语权被打破,引领了“话语狂欢”时代的到来。“微博问政”、“微博反腐”、“微博舆论监督”成为公众关注社会动态、参与社会事件、引导舆论、社会监督的新风尚。“以人为本”的“自媒体”的发展使媒介真正成为“人”的延伸。从本质上来说,思想政治教育就是运用话语体现说服、教育和促进受教育者进步的社会实践活动。思想政治教育话语不仅是信息的交换,也是信息交换活动中话语者地位和权威的象征,思想政治教育话语权在思想政治教育话语体系中居于核心地位。“微时代”背景下高校思想政治教育话语权发生了新的变化,机遇与挑战并存。首先,高校思想政治教育的主体,教育者和受教育者话语权得到了空前的释放和提升,为提高话语权的影响力提供了新的机遇。其次,由于思想政治教育话语在传播中的流失或“稀释”、话语平台建设的不完善及有效行使话语权的外部机制的欠缺,动摇了高校思想政治教育的教育者的话语权,受教育者在缺乏正确引导的情况下,导致了话语权滥用、话语权失范现象的产生。巴西著名教育家保罗·弗莱雷曾指出：“如果教育独立于权力之外,独立于现实社会,那么学校只能成为一堆抽象的价值观和概念的场所,或是技能的表演场地。”本文的研究从以下几个方面展开分析与探讨：首先,对高校思想政治教育话语权的内涵与外延关系进行论述,并对“微时代”与思想政治教育话语权的相关性进行分析。其次,分析、运用马克思主义经典作家的语言思想、传播与宣传思想、教育与社会环境相关性的思想,参考福柯的“权力话语论”、葛兰西的“文化霸权理论”、巴赫金的“对话理论”作为高校思想政治教育话语权研究的理论依据与理论借鉴。最后,在对“微时代”高校思想政治教育话语权存在的问题进行辩证归因分析的基础上,以高校思想政治教育话语权的主体、载体和外在保障机制为视角,探讨了“微时代”背景下提升高校思想政治教育话语权,从而增进高校思想政治教育信度与效度的若干对策。更多还原

【Abstract】 The media master of Communication, McLuhan thought that:" Medium is the basic motive power to social development, that is also the symbol to distinguish the different social formation." The arrival of the Micro-era, promoting the development of social media, the micro-blog as a representative, traditional media monopoly discourse power is broken, which satisfies the public pluralism discourse expression, leading to the arrival of era of "discourse carnival". Participating in the political process, anti-corruption, supervision the public opinion by the micro-blog become the new fashion which the public to pay attention to the social dynamic, participate in social events, lead public opinion, supervise the society. The development of "self-media" which is of people oriented, making the media really become an extension of the "people".In essence, ideological and political education is the social practice activity which uses the discourse reflects persuade,educate and accelerate the progress of educatees, the ideological and political education of discourse is not only the exchange of information, it is also the symbol of status and authority for the use of discourse during the activity of the exchange of information, the ideological and political education discourse power has the core status in the discourse system of ideological and political education. Under the time-background of the Micro-era, the discourse power of ideological and political education of university has new changes, coexistence of opportunity and challenge.First of all, for the body of the ideological and political education of university, the discourse power of educators and college students gets unprecedented release and promote, which provides new opportunities to expand the influence of the discourse power of ideological and political education of university. Second, because the lacking or diluting of the spread of the ideological and political education discourse, the platform to realize discourse power is imperfection and the lack of external guarantee mechanism, which shake the discourse power of educators of ideological and political education of university, while college students is in the absence of correct guidance, leading to the appear of phenomenon which the discourse power is abuse and anomie.Brazil’s famous educator, Paulo Freirehas pointed out that:"If the education is independent of the power, the realistic society, so the school can only become the place of a pile of abstract values and concepts, or the space to perform the skills." Therefore, this article’s analysis and discussion from the following aspects:first, expounding the related theory of the discourse power of ideological and political education of university, and analyzing the relativity between the time-background of the Micro-era and the discourse power of ideological and political education.Second, analyzing and applying the thought of Marxism classical writers about:the language, communication, publicity and education, and the relationship between education and social environment, referencing Michel Foucault’s theory of "power discourse", Gramsci’s "theory of cultural hegemony", Bakhtin’s "theory of dialogue", which as the theoretical basis and theoretical reference for the study on discourse power of ideological and political education of university. Finally, on the basis of analyzing the reason to the existing problems of the discourse power of ideological and political education of university under the time-background of the Micro-era, starting from the realization of the discourse power of ideological and political education’s main body, carrier and external guarantee mechanism as the viewpoint, discussing a number of strategies to promoting the discourse power of ideological and political education to improve the reliability and effectiveness of discourse power of ideological and political education of university under the time-background of the Micro-era.更多还原