【作者】 杨艳；

【导师】 徐继强；

【作者基本信息】 上海师范大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2014， 硕士

【摘要】 法律规范冲突的现象在法律体系中的体现越来越明显,现实中的典型案例越来越多,尤其是在民事领域更加突出。目前,我国正处在法治社会的构建阶段,如果法律规范冲突不能很好的解决,对建设法治社会是极为小利的,因此,解决法律规范冲突迫在眉睫。本文在写作过程中,主要借助了现实生活中的典型案例,通过案例来分析法律规范冲突。主要从四个方面进行分析,即法律规范冲突的界定、成因、类型及选择适用权、解决方式。第一部分主要列举了学界对法律规范冲突的不同观点,在众多观点的基础上重新界定法律规范冲突。文章通过列举归纳的方法给出法律规范冲突的概念和特征,在了解了概念和特征的基础上,进行相似概念的区别分析。其中,最为突出的是对法律规范冲突和法律冲突的概念比较。笔者认为,法律规范冲突是法律冲突的下位概念,虽然在性质上两者是相同的,但在外延上是不同的,法律冲突的外延大于法律规范冲突的外延。通过分析,法律规范冲突的定义是指：两个或者两个不同的法律规范可以调整同一社会关系,适用不同的法律规范会产生不一样的法律后果,它是“法律规范竞合”的一种。第二部分是对产生法律规范冲突的原因分析,主要介绍了三种原因即：社会变迁的影响：利益多元化；立法体制的复杂性,其中,导致法律规范冲突最根本的原因是利益的多元化。本文对于立法体制的复杂性这一原因,又分为三点小的原因,这里小再叙述。再次,是对法律规范冲突的类型分析,本文观点有两种类型：一是显性冲突；二是隐性冲突。显性冲突又可以分为两小类,一是上位法与下位法的冲突；二是横向法律规范冲突。横向法律规范冲突包括：一般法与特别法的冲突、新法于旧法的冲突。这两类冲突主要通过两个典型案例来说明,一是泸州“包二奶”案；二是洛阳种子案。分析案例的同时与法官的选择适用权相结合,进一步发现我国法官的选择适用权存在的问题,对现实中的判案造成哪些弊端。最后主要运用法律方法来分析解决问题。法律方法一般包括这几个方面：法律解释、利益衡量、法律的发现、法律的续造等方法。本文主要介绍的是利益衡量和法律解释的方法,同时针对显性和隐性两本种不同类型的冲突提出了小同的解决方案。笔者认为：不同类型的冲突有小同的解决方式,显性冲突的解决不但要适用冲突规则,而且要赋予法官一定的司法审查权。隐性冲突的解决方式要成为一种日常程序,并运用法律解释的方法避免冲突,更需要运用指导性案例解决冲突。更多还原

【Abstract】 the phenomenon of legal norms conflictingwith each other in legal system is increasingly apparent and many typical cases were appeared in our life.In the field of civil,the phenomenon is prominent.If legal norms conflict can not be solved,it is likely to cause the public don’t believe the law and that extremely unfavorable for our country to build the rule of law,so to solve legal norms conflict is extremely urgent.This article in writing mainly use the typical case of real life and through typical case toanalyze the legal norms conflict.Mainly analyzed from four aspects, namely, to define the legal norms of conflict, causes, types, and choice to apply the right solution.The first part of this article introduces some different views of academic world that about legal norms conflict,On the basis of many perspectives redefine the legal norms conflict.The article is to conduct comprehensive analysis about legal norms conflict and to give the concept and characteristic of legal norms conflict by summarized list.The discriminant analysis between the similar concepts is on the basic of understanding concept and characteristics.The most prominent is the concept of conflict of legal norms and legal conflicts comparison.1believe that the conflict of laws’s lower concept is legal norms conflict.Although the nature of the two are the same, but are different on the epitaxial.The author believes that the definition of legal norms conflict means that two or different legal norms can be adjusted in the same social relations, the application of different legal norms will have different legal consequences, it is one of the"competing legal norms".The second part of this article analyze the causes of legal norms conflict.There are three main reasons:First, the impact of social change; Second, the diversification benefits; Third, the complexity of the legislative system.The most fundamental cause of conflict is the diversity of legal norms interests between them.The complexity of the legislative system of the reason has been divided into three small reasons,not described here.Once more, the analysis about type of legal norms conflict, there are two points of view:one is dominant conflict and another is hidden conflict. Overt conflict can be divided into two subcategories that are conflict between host and under law and the lateral legal norms.Lateral legal norms conflict including categories that are conflict between General law and Special law and conflict between the new law and old law. These two types of conflict are mainly through two typical cases to illustrate, one is Luzhou "mistresses" case and the other is seed Luoyang case. Analysis of the case at the same time and select the appropriate combination of the right to judge further found that judges choose to apply the right of the problems caused by the judgment of the reality of what the drawbacks are.The last major use of legal methods is to analyze and solve problems. Legal method generally includes several aspects:legal interpretation, benefits measure, the found of the law, the law continued making methods. This paper describes the benefits and legal interpretation methods to measure, but for the dominant and recessive two kinds of different types of conflicts have proposed different solutions. I think that different types of conflicts have different solutions, resolving conflicts not only overt conflict rules to be applied but aloes to be given the right to judicial review of certain judges, hidden conflicts are resolved to become an everyday program, and the use of legal interpretation methods to avoid conflict, but requires the use of guiding cases to resolve conflicts.更多还原