【作者】 王媛媛；

【导师】 刘志刚； 傅剑仁；

【作者基本信息】 河北大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 我国现行的《公司法》虽然确立了公司法人格否认制度，但规定比较原则和抽象，对于公司法人格否认的构成要件和诉讼程序等问题没有作具体规定，在司法实践中，公司法人格否认之诉由谁提出，谁是适格的被告，案件管辖，原、被告的举证责任，判决效力的扩张，民事责任的承担，以及法律适用等存在着大量的特殊问题，迫切需要进一步研究解决。因此，加强对我国公司法人格否认制度的探讨，对保障当事人的合法权益，完善我国司法制度，具有十分重要的理论和现实意义。本文主要运用实证分析的方法，结合司法实践，对我国公司法人格否认制度的构成要件、适用情形、诉讼机制和相关法律适用问题进行了探讨。全文共分为四部分。本文首先从公司人格独立和股东的有限责任入手，引出公司法人制度的缺陷。再阐述、分析公司法人人格否认这一制度的基本内容：涵义及其法律特征，目的是为了能更准确地认识公司法人人格否认制度，及其确立的意义。第二部分，通过运用比较研究的方法，阐释了具有代表性的美国、英国、德国、日本四国的公司法人人格否认制度，从而借鉴外国的司法实践经验。同时阐述了我国公司法人人格否认制度的立法现状及不足之处，以期对其进行完善。第三部分和第四部分是本文写作的重点。其中第三部分阐释了我国公司法人人格否认制度的法律适用问题。该部分对我国公司法人人格否认制度法律适用的构成要件、适用情形、适用规则及适用后果，通过案例分析的方式进行具体而深入的分析。第四部分重点阐释了我国公司法人格否认制度的诉讼机制及其在司法实践中的完善。诉讼机制主要从管辖法院、案由、诉讼当事人、举证责任的分配、判决效力以及适用的审判程序进行论述。同时在我国实践中，应严格公司法人格否认制度的适用情形，限制公司法人格否认制度的适用。本文最后探讨了公司法人格否认制度完善的其他问题。不仅要通过公司法人格否认制度的适用加强公司的社会责任，同时建议运用典型案例来指导审判实践，以期规范和完善公司法人格否认制度在我国司法实践中的运用。更多还原

【Abstract】 Although the current Corporation Law of China has established the denial to companylegal person status system, the regulation is quite principled and abstract because problemsabout essential condition and contentious procedure related to the above-mentioned systemhas not be regulated specifically. In judicial practice, a number of problems need to be furtherresearched and solved urgently, such as who should initiate the proceeding, who is the properparty to pursue the action, the management of the cases, the burden of proof of the plaintiffand the respondent, the expanding of the verdict banding, the assumption of civil liability, theadaptability of the law and so on. Therefore, the discussion of how to strengthen the denial tocompany legal person status system has very crucial theoretical and practical sense to theprotection of clients`legal rights and the improvement of domestic judicial system.This dissertation discusses about the denial to company legal person status system’s theessential condition, the cases of application, the proceeding mechanism and the application ofrelated laws, using the way of empirical analysis and combining the judicial practice.The whole essay is divided into four parts. At first, this article introduce the defects ofthe company legal person system from the point of the company`s independent legalpersonality and shareholder`s limited liability. Then, it states and analyzes the basic content,the definition and the legal character of the denial to company legal person status system, theaim of which is to let people know exactly about it and the significance of its establishment.Secondly, by the way of comparative analysis, this article explains the denial to companylegal person status systems of four representative countries the USA, the UK, Germany andJapan, thereby drawing on the experience of foreign judicial practice. Meanwhile, the articlestates the current domestic legislative situation and the inadequacy of the denial to companylegal person status systems, in order to improve it. Both the third and the forth part is the keypoint of the whole article, thereinto, the third part explains the legal adaptability of the denialto company legal person status systems. This part give specific and deep analysis to theessential condition, the case, the rule and the consequence of application by the way of case analysis. The forth part emphasizes the proceeding mechanism of and the improvement in thejudicial practice of the denial to company legal person status systems. The proceedingmechanism mainly discusses about the competent court, the cause of action, the litigant, thedistribution of the proof burden, the effect of judgment and the judicial procedure. Meanwhile,in domestic practice, the case of application of the denial to company legal person statussystems should be strictly regulated. At last, the whole article discuss other problems of thesystem`s improvement, not only strengthening the social responsibility of the companythrough the application of the system, but also instructing and judging the practice throughtypical cases, in order to stipulate and improve the application of the denial to company legalperson status systems in domestic judicial practice.更多还原