虐待罪案研究

【作者】 梁丽；

【导师】 陈建旭； 陈光辉；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 法律， 2014， 硕士

【摘要】 本文重点分析了王某虐待案，温岭虐童案，结合其他虐待罪案，笔者发现，虐待行为和故意伤害行为较难区分，实践中常以行为是否具有长期、持续的特点，并据此判断行为的主观目的进行区分。在非家庭成员之间，虐待行为也有发生。虐待儿童案件的自诉率极低。笔者认为，行为手段和行为后果是区分虐待行为和故意伤害行为的关键。虐待行为在手段上包含故意伤害行为。虐待行为中，以殴打或其他手段作用于身体，直接造成轻伤害以上后果的行为不应按虐待罪论处，上述行为应根据具体案情，按其他人身伤害犯罪论处。虐待行为中的其他行为，根据是否属情节恶劣，决定是否按虐待罪惩处。长期性、持续性不是虐待行为的必然特征。虐待罪的主体范围不宜限于家庭成员。虐待罪基本犯罪的告诉形式宜由自诉转为公诉。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper focuses on the analysis of Wang abuse case, Wen Ling child abuse case,combined with other abuse cases, the author finds, abuse behavior and intentional injuryare difficult to distinguish. In practice, Distinguishing between these two concepts oftendepends on the behavior of long-term sustainability characteristics to judge thesubjective purpose. Between the non family members, abuse behavior has occurred.Private prosecution rate of child abuse cases is very low. The author thinks, the keys todistinguish abuse and acts of intentional injury are behavior means and behavioralconsequences. Abuse includes acts of intentional injury in means. Acts of abuse, byforce to other body tissues and organs, directly caused light damage or injury, accordingto the crime of intentional injury to punish, other acts of abuse, according to whether avile, are decided whether to follow the crime of abuse punishment. Long-term andconsistency don’t belong to inevitable characteristic of abusive behavior. Abuse thesubject scope of the crime should not be confined to the family members. Tell forms ofcrime of abuse should be composed of private prosecution to the public prosecution.更多还原