【作者】 王丽；

【导师】 郑鹏程；

【作者基本信息】 中南民族大学 ， 法学理论， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 当今社会，信息资源成为最宝贵的社会财富，个人信息具有重要的价值。信息社会的飞速发展，给公众的生活带来便利的同时也出现许多侵权现象，影响公众的正常生活，制定个人信息保护法迫在眉睫。虽然我国于2013年2月出台了《信息安全技术公共及商用服务信息系统个人信息保护指南》，但是仍然问题重重，有待解决。因此，本文立足于法理学视角，通过价值取向的分析，对我国个人信息保护法的现状进行学理分析，从而探索健全和完善我国的法律的路径和措施。笔者认为，我们应该立足于现代社会的发展现实和态势，认真对待公民的个人信息权利，确立以人为本，人权至上、法治、民主、权利保护等基本理念，兼顾个人利益、群体利益、社会公共利益，通过借鉴、吸纳欧美国家的先进的有益的法律制度，建设和完善富有中国特色和时代特质的宪法、法律、法规、地方性法规多元多类型并存的个人信息权利法律保护体系，形成制度化、法律化、规范化的措施、机制和方式，形成富有成效的有益的法律保障和救济体制，从而充分地保障公民的个人信息权利，保障公民的自由、权利、利益。本文针对个人信息保护的法理分析，从四个部分展开分析论述：第一部分针对个人信息及个人信息权的内涵进行分析。首先对个人信息的概念做出辨析，其次对个人信息权进行了权利属性分析，认为个人信息权具有双重属性，兼具人格权性质与财产权性质，很难将其归入具体的权利类别之中，进而得出个人信息权是一种独立的新型权利。第二部分对个人信息保护立法背后的法理予以分析，主要从两大方面解读立法的法理基础：一方面是理论基础，另一方面是现实基础。其一，理论基础分别从人本主义、人权理论、权利冲突论以及利益衡平论角度加以论述；其二，从个体、政府机关、商业机构这三种利益主体出发来论述立法应该尽快制定的现实需求。第三、四部分是对个人信息保护的价值取向进行分析。个人信息保护法的价值取向是多元化的，存在冲突是必然的。第三部分着重分析了个人信息保护法的价值取向及其冲突和整合。第四部分在对欧美价值取向做出利弊分析之后，得出我国的个人信息保护应该坚持的价值取向。第五部分立足于价值取向对我国立法现状、立法缺陷进行必要性分析，而后对个人信息保护法做出几点设想。更多还原

【Abstract】 In today’s society, information resource becomes the most important treasure ofthe society. Personal information has important social value. With the rapiddevelopment of the information society, have brought us not only the convenience ofthe public life, but also appeared a lot of tort phenomenon, which is affecting thenormal life of the public. So we need formulate personal information protectionimmediately. Although China promulgated the "information security technology inpublic and commercial information service system of personal information protectionguidelines" in2013February, but still have many problems to be solved. So in thispaper, I will stand the perspective of jurisprudence and base on the value orientation,which carries on the analysis to the present situation of our country’s personalinformation protection in order to explore suitable for China’s law.The author thinks that we should base on the reality of the development ofmodern society and situational. We should treat personal information rights of citizensseriously. Establish the basic concept which is people-oriented, supremacy of humanrights, rule of law, democracy, and rights protection and so on. We should giveconsideration to two or more things about individual interests, group interests, andsocial public interest. Through learn, absorbing European and American countries ofthe advanced legal system, the construction and perfect the rich Chinesecharacteristics and era characteristics of the constitution, the laws and regulations,local regulations various multi-type coexistence system of legal protection of personalinformation rights, form the institutionalization and legalization and standardizationof measures, mechanism and means, to form a productive beneficial legal protectionand remedy system, so as to fully protect the rights of citizens’ personal information,guarantee citizens’ freedom and rights and interests.This article is divided into four parts which is based on legal analysis of personalinformation protection: Part one: Analyze the concept of personal information and the right of personalinformation. Firstly, I make analysis the concept of personal information. Secondly Imake analysis of personal information right of the right attributes. That personalinformation right has dual attributes, which have both personality right and propertyright nature. It is difficult to be classified as the specific rights category. Thereby, thepersonal information right is a new right independent.Part two: Analyzed the underling legal principle of personal informationprotection, mainly from the legal basis of the two aspects of legislation. First,theoretical basis are discussed respectively from the conflict of humanism, the theoryof human rights, rights and interests balance theory; Secondly, from the point of viewof the individual, government agencies, businesses of the three kinds of stakeholdersto discuss the legislation should be formulated as soon as possible the real demand.Part three&Part four: Analyzed the value orientation of personal informationprotection. The value orientation of the personal information protection is diversified.Conflict is inevitable. Part three, focus on the analysis of the personal informationprotection law of value orientation and conflict and integration. Part four, analysis ofthe value orientation of the European counties and the untied states of America. Andthen, the value orientation of our country should adhere to the.Part five: Based on value orientation，Analysis of the current situation andlegislative defects of legislation in China. Afterwards, make some assumptions on thepersonal information protection law.更多还原