【作者】 李媛媛；

【导师】 田径；

【作者基本信息】 哈尔滨工业大学 ， 马克思主义哲学， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 本文的研究主题是前南斯拉夫马克思主义者勃朗科·霍尔瓦特在其代表作《社会主义政治经济学——一种马克思主义的社会理论》当中所阐释出的社会形态理论。以霍尔瓦特所处时代的社会现实为背景，根据霍尔瓦特在该书中的运思路向，本文包含以下三个主要部分：首先，关于资本主义与国家主义的批判，这从以下三个层面展开：政治方面，资本主义政治体制形成历史及其现状，国家主义的政治体制结构、意识结构以及组织模型与危机；经济方面，资本主义经济制度的形成历史、组织模型及其效率与危机，与国家主义政治组织模型同构的经济模式的效率；总体方面，资本主义与国家主义的社会分层与在哲学上的异化、物化性质。其次，关于自治社会主义理论的构建，这包括过渡理论以及自治社会主义的建设理论：过渡理论方面，分析作为过渡的主体新工人阶级，并提出过渡的一般契机、战略与具体的过渡途径；自治社会主义建设理论方面，一是对社会主义做价值上的论证，二是对自治社会主义的组织模式、政治与经济制度的分析。最后，结合前两部分，分析霍尔瓦特的社会形态理论意义与局限。就意义而言，有助于反思历史决定论观点，为批判资本主义提供了一种新的视角，总结了苏东社会主义建设的教训，为未来理想社会所设计的蓝图对于中国特色社会主义建设有可供借鉴之处；就局限而言，劳动概念有一定局限性与模糊性，霍尔瓦特所进行的资本主义与国家主义的区分不具有普遍适用性，霍尔瓦特未就社会主义的必要性与社会形态变迁的规律性之关系做出说明。更多还原

【Abstract】 The research topic of this dissertation is the theory of social form which is putforward in The Political Economy of Socialism: A Marxist Social Theory，which ismagnum opus of Branko Horvat, a former Yugoslav Marxist. With the background ofsocial reality in Horvat’s time and based on his logical path in the book，thisdissertation includes three main parts:Firstly, the critique of capitalism and etatism. This part following consists of threeaspects:political aspect including the history and current situation of the capitalisticpolitical system, and the political system, conscious structure, organization model andits crisis; economic aspect including the history of the capitalistic economic system，organization model and its efficiency, and the efficiency of economic model ofEtatism which is isomorphic with its political organization model; and global aspectincluding the social stratification of capitalism and Etatism, and their philosophicalalienation and reification.Secondly, the theory of construction of autonomous socialism. This part includesthe theory of transition and the constructive theory of autonomous socialism. Theformer contains the analysis of the new working class als the subject oftransition,and general moment, strategy and concrete approaches. The latter containsthe argumentation in value for socialism, and analysises about organization model andpolitical-economic system of autonomous socialism.Lastly, analysises of significance and limitations of Horvat’s theory of social form.As for its significance, this theory contributes to reflection on the historicaldeterminism, offers a new view for the critique of capitalism, summarizes the lessonof soviet eastern, and the blueprint of future ideal society is worthy for buildingsocialism with Chinese characteristics. in terms of limitations: his concept of labor isblurry; his distinction between capitalism and etatism is general; he does not explainthe relationship between necessity of socialism and regularity of change of socialform更多还原