【作者】 李洁；

【导师】 易小平；

【作者基本信息】 广西大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 理解,不仅包括我们对某事某物本身的理解,也包括对某种理解的理解。我们理解屈原的作品,不仅包括理解屈原作品文本本身,也包括理解他人对屈原作品的理解。所以,理解他人对屈原作品的理解也是我们研究屈原作品的题中之旨。本文主要研究清人胡文英是如何理解屈原作品的。胡文英《屈骚指掌》一书成书于乾隆二十六年(1761),刊成于乾隆五十一年(1786),它是“尤嗜屈骚”的胡文英注骚的心血之作。《屈骚指掌》共四卷,只注他所认为是屈原所作的文章,共二十五篇。他注骚非常重视对屈骚内在旨趣的发掘。注释时先自解,然后参考它书,若有所取,必表其名。对于胡文英如何解读屈原作品,本文主要从两大方面即思想内容和艺术特色来考察。思想内容方面主要考察胡文英对屈原作品历史观、现实观、神话观的解读。艺术特色方面主要考察胡文英对屈原形象、屈原作品修辞手法和语言的解读。胡文英认为屈原在作品中展现了一个“无聊”的形象,而在与怀王的君臣关系中,屈原、怀王均有误。他提出了以求女喻求君侧之贤人之说,受到游国恩等人的认同。他认为屈原作品是押韵的,并具有楚地方言的特色。但他释读屈原作品也有一些牵强附会之处。同时,本文亦考察了胡文英注骚的时代特色,如以“时文”之法评点屈原作品、考证的特色。总之,胡文英注骚既有汉儒治经训诂的余风,亦注重对屈骚文脉大意的梳理。而《屈骚指掌》注释简约而不乏新见,是一个值得楚辞研究者一读的楚辞注本。更多还原

【Abstract】 Understand, include not only our understanding of somethings itself, Also include the understanding of some understandings. We understand Qu Yuan’s works, including not only to understand Qu Yuan’s works itself, also to understand other people’s understanding of Qu Yuan’s works. So, It’s our research purport of Qu Yuan’s works to understand other people’s understanding of Qu Yuan’s works. This paper mainly studies and Hu Wenying who lifed in the Qing dynasty was how to understand Qu Yuan’s works. Hu Wenying’s Qu Sao Zhi Zhang is a book written in Qianlong26years (1761), published in the51years of Qianlong (1786). Hu Wenying especially addicted to Qu Yuan’s works,and he writted this book so hard. Qu Sao Zhi Zhang have four volumes. It only note what he thinks is Qu Yuan’s article, a total of25articles. He note Qu Yuan’s works very concerned about the excavation of Qu Yuan’s works inherent purport. When he note thinking by himself firstly, and then reference other books, if have someone’s ideas, will table the name. And how Hu Wenying read Qu Yuan’s works, this article mainly from two aspects namely ideological content and artistic features to inspect. Ideological content mainly inspects Hu Wenying’s concept of historical,reality, myth. Artistic features to Qu Yuan’s works mainly inspects Hu Wenying how to unscramble the image of Qu Yuan, figures of speech and language. Hu Wenying thinks Qu Yuan showed a boring image in his works. In the relationship between Qu Yuan and King Huai, he thinks that Qu Yuan and King Huai have a mistake. He put forward a viewpoint about putting good women compare to ministers beside the king. It has received the approval by You Guoen. He thinks that Qu Yuan’s works is the rhyming, and has the characteristic of The chu’s place words. But he also has some far-fetched interpretation. At the same time,this article also investigates some time features about Hu Wenying interpret Qu Yuan’s works, such as using eight-legged essays’s way to comment on articles,textual research. Anyhow, Hu Wenying interprets Qu Yuan’s works liking the Han dynasty scholars explanations of words in ancient books, and also he pays attention to comprehend of Qu Yuan’s works context. Qu Sao Zhi Zhang is simple,but also has original opinions. It is a book worthy of Chu Ci researchers to read.更多还原