【作者】 刘峰；

【导师】 陈祥健；

【作者基本信息】 福建师范大学 ， 民商法学， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 商事留置权渊源于中世纪意大利商业习惯法,基于商事留置权具有提升债务人商业信用,保障交易高效、安全的功能,该制度广泛地为各国立法继承与发展。《物权法》第231条规定：“债权人留置的动产,应当与债权属于同一法律关系,但企业之间留置的除外。”这是我国首次从立法层面承认商事留置权与民事留置权适用不同的规则,同时创设了我国的商事留置权制度。但是,该规定简单笼统,无法涵盖整个商事留置权制度,实践中也存在诸多适用争议。分析可知,商事留置权适用于表见商人、善意取得制度,可以基于非法律行为取得,但无法基于继受取得。结合域外商事留置权立法例以及商事留置理论的分析,针对我国现行立法存在的主要问题提出完善的建议,主张将主体扩及至商人、标的物应当包括有价证券、明确牵连关系的界定、确立紧急留置制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 Commercial lien origin in medieval Italy, the city law, aimed at increasing the commercial credit of the debtor and protecting the efficiency and security of transactions, so that the system is extensively inherited and developed during national legislation. Section231of " Property Law" provides:" the retention of property and claims should belong to the same legal relationship, but between businesses, except for retention," This is the first legislation of commercial lien and civil lien have different rules in China. But the simple provisions, unable to cover the entire system of commercial lien, there are also many applicable disputes in practice. After the analysis, commercial lien can be applied to Apparent Agency and the Acquisition in Good Faith, can be based on non-juristic acts, but can’t be derivative acquisition. According to the legislation abroad for commercial lien and provisions of commercial lien theoretical analysis, it mainly aimed at the existing problem of legislation proposals to perfect commercial lien system problem. Mainly including that commercial lien subject should be businessmen, commercial lien subject matter including securities, definition implications, the establishion of the emergency retention system and so on.更多还原