节点文献
论渎职犯罪中损失结果的认定
Identification of Results of Loss in Malfeasance Crime
【作者】 朱洪涛;
【导师】 董翠香;
【作者基本信息】 山东大学 , 法律(专业学位), 2013, 硕士
【摘要】 渎职犯罪,是指国家机关工作人员利用职务上的便利或者徇私舞弊、滥用职权、玩忽职守,妨害国家机关公务的合法、公正、有效执行,损害国民对国家机关公务的客观、公正、有效执行的信赖,致使国家和人民利益遭受重大损失的行为。渎职犯罪不仅造成公共财产、国家和人民利益的损失,更危害了国家机关的正常公务活动,致使政府的公信力缺失。我国刑法分则第九章对渎职犯罪的规定,及2006年7月施行的《最高人民检察院关于渎职侵权犯罪案件立案标准的规定(高检发释字[2006]2号)》,是现阶段反渎职侵权工作的最重要的法律依据。但是,通过司法实践发现我国现有的这些规定并不能完全满足具体办案需要。什么是损失,不同的损失如何认定,现有制度的设定是否体现法律的效率价值,这些问题都需要解决。本文从三个部分分别对损失的内涵及其分类、不同类别损失的认定思路及以经济学的方法来分析现有的损失认定问题。第一章主要论述了损失的内涵、特点,分析了损失结果和犯罪结果的关系,分析了损失结果在认定渎职犯罪中的作用和地位,通过分析阐明了损失结果是结果犯类型的渎职犯罪的构成要件的重要组成部分。第二章是以探索的心态,尝试用经济学的方法分析现有认定损失结果的规定,并以经济学基本价值——效率——为评判标准,阐述了如何制定更有利于节省社会资源的法律规范。第三章以损失的分类为主线,首先分析了损失结果的按照不同标准所做的分类,然后结合具体的分类进行认定分析,以现有的法律规定为基础,以实证和功利的价值理念阐述了现有制度具体的不足和改进建议。
【Abstract】 Malfeasance crime refers to the behavior of the state personnel, who, using the convenience of position, or by engaging in malpractices for personal gain, abusing their powers, and neglecting their duties, do harm to the legal, fair and effective implementation of the public affairs of state organs, and destroy people’s faith in the objective, fair and effective implementation of the state organs, thus causing the country and the people’s heavy losses.Malfeasance crime not only cause losses of public property and interest of both nation and people, but also does more harm to the normal public activities of the state organs, resulting in the lack of government’s credibility. Definition of Malfeasance crime in Chapter9of China’s criminal law, and "definition of filing standard of malpractice tort criminal case by the supreme people’s procuratorate"enforced in July2006, are the most important legal basis of anti-malpractice tort work. However, through the judicial practice it is found that these existing rules in China cannot completely meet the needs in handling cases. What is a loss, how to identify different losses, whether the setting of the existing system reflect legal efficiency value--these problems all need to be resolved.This article analyzes the problems of existing loss identification from three parts respectively, including the connotation of the loss and its classification, thought of identification of different types of losses and the method of economics.The first chapter mainly discusses the connotation and characteristics of the loss, analyzes the relation of results of loss and the consequences of the crime, also analyzes the function and position of the results of loss in the identification of malpractice crime, and through the analysis illustrates the results of loss the results constitutes an important part of the major elements of malfeasance crime.In the second chapter, the author, by the mentality of exploration, tries to analyze the provisions of the existing loss results by the method of economics, and discusses how to make the kind of laws and regulations which are more conducive to save social resources, using the evaluation standard of the economics basic value-efficiency.In the third chapter, the author, using the classification of loss as the main line, first analyzes the classification of loss of the results according to different standards, then makes identification and analysis combining with specific classification combining with specific classification, and on the basis of the existing laws and regulations, discusses specific deficiencies of the existing system and Suggestions for improvement by concept of the empirical and utilitarian.
- 【网络出版投稿人】 山东大学 【网络出版年期】2013年 S2期
- 【分类号】D924.393
- 【被引频次】3
- 【下载频次】255