【作者】 龙敏；

【导师】 蒋学跃；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 法律， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 随着我国经济社会的快速发展，公司纠纷亦呈现多样化和复杂化的发展趋势。近年来，我国司法实践在公司纠纷案件审理中面临的一个突出难题，即部分实体法上赋予的权利缺乏相应的程序支撑，导致权利主体在实现诉权、保障实体权利的诉讼过程中遇到障碍和困难。普通诉讼程序显然与许多公司纠纷的性质特点不相适应，严重影响了当事人通过寻求司法救济维护自身合法权益的效果。为了保障公司纠纷的高效合理解决，维护公司的正常运转和市场经济的健康有序发展，针对部分特殊公司纠纷的性质及特点，设立相应的特殊程序制度即针对公司纠纷的非讼程序十分必要。非讼程序相对于诉讼程序具有不可替代的制度优势，在我国构建公司非讼程序有其必要性和可行性。关于公司非讼程序的构建主要包括两个部分：一是关于实体法上公司非讼事件类型的确定，二是关于程序法上公司非讼程序的规定。公司纠纷非讼程序的适用范围即公司非讼事件的类型是作为实体法的公司法中应当予以明确规定的，也是公司非讼程序在司法实践中能够明确适用的一个前提。目前亟需适用非讼程序的公司纠纷有股东知情权纠纷、股东会召集权纠纷、异议股东股份价格评估权纠纷、董事因消极资格引起的司法解任纠纷、涉及公益的公司解散纠纷、公司特别清算纠纷等。而对于公司非讼程序在程序法上的构建，应当在现行《民事诉讼法》之外单独设置专门的《民事非讼程序法》，规定非讼程序的基本运行原则，主要包括立法方式、立法体例以及管辖、审级、裁判方式等方面内容，并在其中的商事非讼程序部分对有关公司非讼程序的特殊规则作出规定，从而形成一个能够独立适用的法律框架体系。同时，在司法实践中往往会出现诉讼事件非讼化以及诉讼程序与非讼程序的交错适用，此即非讼程序与诉讼程序的融合，也是有其合理性的。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the fast development of economic and society in China, company disputesappears complex and diversified development trend. In recent years, the cases hearingcompany disputes in the judicial practice of China have confronted with a prominentproblem. The absence of equivalent procedure support for the rights granted by partialsubstantive law gives rise to the obstacles and difficulties for the subject of rights torealize just claims, and to guarantee substantive rights in the litigation procedure. Thenormal litigation procedure apparently is incompatible with the nature and feature ofmany company disputes, which influences the parties to protect their legal rights andinterests by seeking for judicial remedies. Which regard to the nature and features ofsome special company disputes, it is essentially necessary to establish a specialprocedural system concerning the non-contentious procedure. The non-contentiousprocedure has systematic strength which cannot be substituted in contrast withlitigation procedure, it is necessary and feasible to establish the non-contentiousprocedure about company disputes. The construction of non-contentious procedureabout company disputes mainly includes two parts, one of them is determinationabout the type of company non-contentious events, the other one is regulations ofnon-contentious procedure about company disputes in procedural law. Theconfirmation of the category of company non-contentious cases on litigation,confirming the application scope of company non-contentious procedure, is acompulsory condition for realizing practical effects in judicial practice. At present,which company disputes badly need to apply to non-contentious procedure concludethe disputes of shareholders’ rights, the disputes of convening shareholders’meetings, judicial dismissal of directors, disputes about the price of the shares of thedissenting shareholders appraisal rights, disputes about dissolution and liquidation ofcompany. With regard to the establishment of corporate non-contentious procedureunder procedural law, it is necessary to set up the special civil non-contentiousprocedure despite the civil procedural law in force, stipulating the fundamentaloperation principles which mainly include legislation method, legislation system,jurisdiction, judicial level and judgment method ect. It shall also consider the specialrules with respect to the corporate non-contentious procedure under the commercialnon-contentious procedure part, which thereafter forms a legal framework system that can be independently applied. Meanwhile, the non-litigation-based of litigation casesand the interchangeable application of non-contentious procedure and litigationprocedure, which are actually the integration of non-contentious, take place quiteoften in judicial practice whit its significant rationality.更多还原