【作者】 耿静；

【导师】 车丽娟；

【作者基本信息】 东北财经大学 ， 国际贸易学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 上世纪七十年代末开始,我国知识产权制度开始建立,先后出台了《商标法》、《专利法》、《著作权法》、《反不正当竞争法》等有关知识产权保护的基本法律。随着改革开放的深入和经济的发展,知识产权立法工作面临着前所未有的挑战,需要满足不断增长的新要求。我国高新技术产业从零起步走向全面发展,已经成为国民经济中增长最为迅速的产业部门,高新技术企业的发展与知识产权及其保护密切相关。对高新技术企业来说,如何促进高新技术企业的技术创新以便拥有自主知识产权并能进行有效保护,已经成为必须解决的问题。没有知识产权法律的保障,高新技术的发展就缺乏强大的动力机制,高新技术产业发展将成为无源之水。对于高新技术企业以及政府各相关部门而言,深入剖析高新技术企业的知识产权保护现状、存在问题及其内在原因,并借鉴国内外的先进经验,在知识产权法律制度的框架下,从战略高度提出保护高新技术知识产权的战略和措施,具有十分重要的现实意义。本文对中国在入世后,在高新技术知识产权保护方面所面临的知识产权保护的问题进行了分析,发达国家美国及发展中国家印度在高新技术知识产权保护方面做的相当出色,他们的许多经验中国是可以有所借鉴的。高新技术知识产权的保护跟上高新技术发展的步伐,才能使我国的高新技术发展起来并走出国门。全文分为六个部分。第一部分对本文涉及的主要概念—高新技术、知识产权及知识产权保护进行了较为详细的解释。高新技术离不开知识产权的保护,高新技术的转让交易的内容就是知识产权,同时,知识产权需要通过技术转让营运来保值升值,技术转让需要知识产权保护才能顺利进行。第二部分对世界知识产权保护的现状及中国入世后国内知识产权及高新技术知识产权保护现状做了深入分析,对中国入世后11年来在知识产权法律上取得的进步做了详细的分析。第三部分为中国高新技术知识产权所面临的问题与挑战。本章以iPad侵权案为例,2012年度在中国发生的最大的高新技术知识产权案件反应了中国知识产权的部分问题。同时,对高新技术知识产权保护的主要问题进行了深入分析。第四部分以美国和印度为例,两国在知识产权保护方面有许多出色的地方时值得中国借鉴的。美国凭借301条款、337条款及FTA,使得自己在知识产权领域具有全球的竞争优势,美国通过行政公开制度与国民待遇对接及通过行政效率制度与国民待遇对接的形式进行知识产权保护是中国应当借鉴的。印度针对本国的技术与经济发展状况,在近40年知识产权制度的完善和发展过程中取得优异成绩。印度在软件行业知识产权保护所取得的成果是中国值得借鉴的。第五部分,为我国高新技术知识产权的保护提出了建议。为应对当前我国高新技术知识产权保护所存在的一系列问题,首先应完善我国高科技发展的激励制度：明确高技术的权利归属,强化激励制度中的科技奖励制度,完善高科技发展的优惠政策；其次,健全我国高新技术保护的法律法规：健全完善我国专利保护制度,增强反不正当竞争法对高新技术的保护,加强企业知识产权保护、创造、运用和管理等。第六部分为对本篇文章的总结,对本文进行总结和展望,并指出本文的不足。更多还原

【Abstract】 China’s intellectual property system began to set up since the end of the1970s, The Trademark Law, The Copyright Law, The anti-unfair competition Law and other intellectual property protection relevant law have issued successively. With the deepening of the reform and the development of the economic, the legislation work of intellectual property is facing an unprecedented challenge, and it needs to meet the growing new requirements.High-tech industry in China has started to move towards all-round development from zero, and it has become the fastest industry department in the national economy growth, the development of high-tech has a close relation with intellectual property protection. For high-tech enterprises, in order to possess and conduct effective protects on proprietary intellectual property rights, the way to promote the technical innovation of high-tech industry is becoming the problems which must be solved. If there is no safeguard by intellectual property law, the development of high-tech will lack strong power mechanism, the development of high-tech will become the situation of water without a source. For the concern of high-tech enterprises and government related departments, the thorough analysis of high-tech enterprises’current intellectual property protection situation, the existed problems and internal cause, draw lessons from domestic and international advanced experience, and propose intellectual property protection strategy and measures will have an very important realistic meaning in the framework of the intellectual property law system.This paper has analyzed the intellectual property protection problems of high-tech after China has entered into the WTO. The developed country-the United States and the developing country-India are doing well in the protection of high-tech intellectual property, many of their experience can be referenced. The protection of high-tech intellectual property should keep up with the pace of high-tech development, only in this way can develop our high-tech and let the high-tech go abroad.The first part of this article has explained the main concepts of high-tech, intellectual property and intellectual property protection in detail. High-tech cannot live without the protection of intellectual property, the trade content of high-tech transfer is intellectual property; at the meanwhile, intellectual property need to through the technology transfer operation to add value, and technology transfer need the protection of intellectual property to go smoothly.The second part has deeply analyzed the status of the world intellectual property protection, and the status of China’s intellectual property and high-tech intellectual property after China has entered into WTO; at the meanwhile, this article has analyzed the progress has been made after China has entered into the WTO for11years.The third part is mainly about the faced problems and challenges of Chinese high-tech intellectual property. In this chapter, the iPad infringement is taken as an example, it is the largest high-tech intellectual property protection case in China in2012, the case has reflected some problems of Chinese intellectual property protection. At the meanwhile, this part has done a thorough analysis on the main problems of high-tech intellectual property protection.The fourth part takes the United States and India as the examples; both of the two countries’intellectual property protections have many excellent aspects which are worth referencing by China. The United States relies on301clause,337clause and FTA, which make itself has a global competitive advantage in the field of intellectual property. What China should reference is that the United States through the butt of administrative public system with national treatment, and the butt of administrative efficiency system with national treatment to protect the intellectual property. In the nearly40years of the intellectual property protection system’s development and perfection process, India has always been good in the performance of the international commitments, also at the same time good in the implementation of safeguard the interests of legislation strategy. The achievement that the India has got in the intellectual property protection of pharmaceutical industry and the software industry are worthy to learn.The fifth part has put forward some suggestions for high-tech intellectual property protection in China. In response to the existing series of questions of high-tech intellectual protection in China, first of all, our country’s high-tech development incentive system should be perfected, the ownership of high-tech should be specified, and the motivation system of science and technology reward system should be enhanced; secondly, China’s high-tech protection laws and regulations should be improved, patent protection system should be perfected, anti-unfair competition law on the protection of the high-tech should be improved, and the protection, creation, use and the management of enterprise’s intellectual property should be strengthened.The last part is the conclusion of this article; it has summarized and prospected, also has pointed out the deficiency of this article.更多还原