【作者】 李莉；

【导师】 黄娟；

【作者基本信息】 华南理工大学 ， 诉讼法学（专业学位）， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 民事诉讼中的证明妨碍制度在西方法治国家已经确立多年，成为重要的民事诉讼制度之一。随着我国法治的进步和民事诉讼制度的日益完备，证明妨碍制度日益走进人们的视野，并被司法界重视。在我国建立到逐渐完备证明妨碍制度的过程中，充分借鉴、学习民主法治国家的先进经验，随着这一制度规范的日益完备和司法实践运用上的逐渐成熟，我们要清醒地发现我国现有立法在这一制度上的缺陷和不足，找到差距并深刻分析产生的原因，主要表现为构成上先天不足，主体限定为不负举证责任的当事人，立法没有把过失证明妨碍纳入到规定当中，妨碍种类单一，内容严重缺失，证明妨碍的结果要件没有明确标准，证明妨碍法律后果缺陷，法律规定不明确等几个方面的问题。通过对该制度现有问题的分析，结合我国的社会、司法实际，寻找改进完备我国这一制度的途径和方式，对症下药，有的放矢地解决问题，既要充分吸收西方先进的东西，特别是对西方成熟运用于司法实践中的调查令制度、证人作证制度的关注和引进，又要兼顾我国国情实际，不可能超越当代中国社会发展的整体水平一枝独秀，建立既与国际接轨、又坚持中国特色的逻辑合理、制度完备、操作流畅的证明妨碍制度，推进我国民事诉讼制度的更加完善、科学。更多还原

【Abstract】 In civil litigation, the system of obstruction of evidence in western countries under therule of law has been established for many years, has become one of important civil litigationsystems. Along with our country government by law advancement and the civil litigationsystem increasingly perfect, the system of obstruction of evidence increasingly into people’svision, and judicial attention.To establish in our country gradually perfect the system ofobstruction of evidence in the process, make full use of democratic legal system country,learning advanced experience, as this system specification is complete and judicial practicegradually mature, we must be clearly found that China’s current legislation on the systemdefects and shortcomings on, find the gap and profound analysis of causes, mainly for theConstitution be congenitally deficient, main body limited to not bear the burden of proof ofthe parties, the legislation does not put the blame on obstruction of evidence into theregulations, prevent serious lack of single type, content, elements of proof impediment resultswithout a definite standard of proof impediment, legal consequence of defects, the law is notclear etc. aspects of the problem.Through this system the analysis of existing problems,combined with China’s social, judicial practice, looking to complete this system in ourcountry and way, an antidote against the disease, have a definite object in view to solve theproblem, we should fully absorb the western advanced things, especially for the westernmature applied in judicial practice in the investigation system, witness system and theintroduction of, take into account the actual circumstances of China, could not go beyond thesocial development of contemporary China’s overall level of one branch alone beautiful,established in line with international standards, and adhere to the Chinese characteristics ofthe logical system of reasonable, complete, smooth operation of the system of obstruction ofevidence, promote China’s civil litigation system more perfect and scientific.更多还原