【作者】 吴文娟；

【导师】 陈立虎；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 国际法学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 “332条款”是美国USITC就关税和贸易态势进行“常规性事实调查”所应遵循的规范。“332条款”调查的最终报告并不包含任何政策性建议，亦不得为任何由总统实施的贸易行动提供法律依据，但它往往是引起反倾销、反补贴等贸易救济措施的“先兆”。本文对“332条款”的具体规则进行了比较详细的分析，并将其与传统的反倾销、反补贴、保障措施、“337条款”和“301条款”等贸易措施进行比较，采用数据统计、案例分析等研究方法，分析了“332调查”的实践，进而对我国在出口贸易中何以应对“332调查”和中国贸易法相关条款的完善提出了建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 "332investigation", known as "routine fact-finding" provisions of the UnitedStates trade law provides that any of the events on Tariffs and Trade may beinvestigated by USITC. The final report under the "332investigation" does not containany policy recommendations.But"332investigation" could be a sign of trade remedyinvestigation..This paper gives a detailed analysis of the section332rules, and compares section332with the anti-dumping, anti-subsidy, safeguard measures,"section337" and "section301" measures. By using data statistics, case analysis and other methods, this pape alsoanalyses the practice of332investigation, and gives some suggestions on how to dealwith332investigation for the goverment and enterprice and how to enhance the relatedrules in Chinese foreign trade law.更多还原