【作者】 王丽；

【导师】 阎晓军；

【作者基本信息】 河北师范大学 ， 应用心理学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 女大学生正处于择偶、谈婚论嫁的阶段，在学习的同时还要面对恋爱、婚姻等情感问题。择偶是恋爱、婚姻的重要前提，影响着女大学生今后的人生，随着经济社会的发展，女性社会地位的提高，她们在社会和家庭中的发言权越来越多，在择偶方面也占有优势，社会的发展使女性的择偶有了新的时代特点。本研究探讨了当今女大学生择偶标准的现状，以及已婚女教师对择偶标准的看法和变化。本论文包括两个部分的研究：第一部分是问卷调查。本研究在参考以往相关文献的基础上，结合开放式访谈，选取了三十六个项目，形成大学生择偶标准问卷和教师择偶标准问卷。分别对两个群体进行调查，结果表明：女大学生和女教师择偶时都比较重视对方的品质性格、身体情况、个人能力以及感情因素，两类群体都不太看重对方的家庭情况和外形，大学生在个人能力、个人品质、社会地位、持家能力方面的平均分均高于教师，而教师在经济状况、体貌特征、身体情况方面的平均分高于大学生。第二部分是深度访谈。本研究选取两位有恋爱经历的女大学生和两位已婚女教师，对四位女性分别进行大约一个小时的深度访谈。将访谈录音转成逐字稿，对访谈资料进行扎根理论取向的分析。结果表明：女大学生和女教师在择偶方面都非常注重对方的个人条件，都不重视男性的外貌，在品质性格和经济能力的具体要求上各有侧重，婚恋经历影响了她们自身的择偶标准。通过以上研究，得出以下结论：（1）女大学生和女教师的择偶标准比较理性现实；（2）女大学生择偶更重视个人能力、个人品质、社会地位、持家能力，女教师择偶更重视经济状况、体貌特征、身体情况；（3）有无恋爱经历对女大学生的择偶标准没有影响；（4）女大学生和女教师择偶时都注重异性的品质性格，但具体内容有所差别；（5）女大学生择偶时倾向注重异性的隐性潜能，女教师倾向异性的显性实力；（6）女大学生和女教师择偶时重视双方相容和心理需求。更多还原

【Abstract】 Female college students are in a stage of mate selection and marriage. While studying,they also face love, marriage and emotional problems. Spouse-selection is an importantpremise for love and marriage. It affects the future life of the female students. With thedevelopment of economy and society, the improvement of women’s social status, they havemore and more voice in social and family. They also have an advantage to choosing a mate.With the development of society, female mate choices have the new characteristics of thetimes. This study explores the present situation of spouse-selection of current female collegestudents, and married female teacher’s views and changes in spouse-selection.This paper includes two parts:The first part is the questionnaire survey. In this study, on the basis of the reference topast literature, combined with open interviews, thirty-six items were selected, andspouse-selection standard questionnaire of college students and teachers were formed. On twogroups of investigation, the results show that: Female college students and teachers pay moreattention to quality character, physical condition, personal ability and emotional factors. Thetwo groups are less concerned about family situation and appearance. The average score ofstudents in personal ability, personal quality, social status, housekeeping skill are higher thanthose of teachers. The average score of teachers in economic status, physical characteristics,physical condition are higher than those of college students.The second part is depth interview. This study selected two love experiences of femalestudents and two married female teachers. The four women were approximately one hour indepth interviews. The interviews were tape recorded into verbatim. The analyses of interviewdata were grounded theory-oriented. The results show that: Female college students andteachers are very focused on individual condition in spouse-selection. They do not attachimportance to the appearance of male. They have each emphasize particularly on the specificrequirements of quality character and economic capacity. Love and marriage experiencesinfluence their own standards.Through the above research, the paper obtains the following conclusions:(1) The spouse-selection of female college students and teachers are more rational reality; (2) Female college students pay more attention to personal ability, personal quality, socialstatus, housekeeping skill. Female teachers pay more attention to economic status, physicalcharacteristics, physical condition;(3) Love experiences have no effect on spouse-selection of female college students;(4) Female college students and teachers focus on the quality character of the opposite sex,but the specific content is different;(5) Female college students tend to focus on the hidden potential of the opposite sex.Female teachers tend to dominant strength of the opposite sex;(6) Female college students and teachers pay attention to both compatible andpsychological needs.更多还原