【作者】 张丽君；

【导师】 阎晓军；

【作者基本信息】 河北师范大学 ， 应用心理学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 当前我国正处于社会转型时期，由传统的农业社会向开放的工业社会转型，由计划经济体质向市场经济体制转型，人们的价值观发生了很大的变化，这必然带来婚恋观念的变化与婚恋行为的多元化，具体表现当今社会婚外恋、离婚、婚前同居等现象，尤其是婚前同居现象比较突出。本研究以80后城市青年为研究对象，考察80后城市青年对婚前同居现象的外显态度和内隐态度，以期对青年行为进行有效预测，为婚恋心理辅导提供有益参考。本研究包括三部分：研究一是外显态度研究，采用问卷调查，从“知”、“情”、“意”、“行”四个维度考察80后城市青年对婚前同居现象的外显态度。研究二是内隐态度研究，运用GNAT测量方法测量80后城市青年对婚前同居现象的内隐态度。实验设计采用2（性别：男vs女）×2（婚否：已婚vs未婚）×4（目标属性词语：婚前同居积极词汇vs婚前同居消极词汇vs婚姻生活积极词汇vs婚姻生活消极词汇）的三因素混合设计，其中性别和婚否为被试间变量，性别分为男和女两个水平，婚否分为未婚和已婚两个水平，目标属性词为被试内变量，分成四类。因变量是d＇，即辨别力指数。研究三是内隐态度研究，运用GNAT测量方法测量80后已婚城市青年有无子女对婚前同居现象内隐态度。实验设计采用2（性别：男vs女）×2（子女：有子女vs无子女）×4（目标属性词语：婚前同居积极词汇vs婚前同居消极词汇vs婚姻生活积极词汇vs婚姻生活消极词汇）的三因素混合设计，其中性别和子女为被试间变量，性别分为男和女两个水平，子女分为有子女和无子女两个水平，目标属性词为被试内变量，分成四类。因变量是d＇，即辨别力指数。通过以上研究，得到如下结论：（1）80后未婚城市青年对婚前同居现象的外显态度比已婚城市青年积极。（2）80后未婚城市青年对婚前同居现象的外显态度存在显著的性别差异，表现为未婚男青年对婚前同居现象的外显态度比未婚女青年积极。（3）80后已婚城市青年对婚前同居现象的外显态度存在显著的性别差异，表现为已婚男青年对婚前同居现象的外显态度比已婚女青年积极。（4）80后未婚城市青年对婚前同居现象的内隐态度比已婚城市青年积极。（5）80后未婚城市青年对婚前同居现象的内隐态度性别差异不显著。（6）80后已婚城市青年对婚前同居现象的内隐态度存在显著的性别差异,表现为已婚男青年对婚前同居现象的内隐态度比已婚女青年积极。（7）80后已婚城市青年中有无子女对婚前同居现象的内隐态度存在显著差异，表现为无子女的青年对婚前同居现象的内隐态度比有子女的青年积极。更多还原

【Abstract】 At present, China is in a period of social transition, which transforms to an openindustrial society from a traditional agricultural society and to market economy from plannedeconomy. People’s values have changed a lot, which will inevitably bring about the changes ofmarriage concept and the diversification of marriage behavior, for example, extramaritalaffairs, divorce, premarital cohabitation, among which pre-marital cohabitation is moreprominent. This research takes the generation after the80s in urban as the subjects, whoseexplicit and implicit attitude on premarital cohabitation are studied to provide effectiveprediction on youth behavior and useful reference for psychological counseling for marriage.Three parts consist of this research:The first study is on the explicit attitude towards premarital cohabitation, usingquestionnaire from four dimensions of "cognition","emotion","will" and "behavior".The second study is on implicit attitude towards premarital cohabitation, using GNATmeasurement. The experiment is three-factor mixed design：2(gender: male vs. female)×2(marital status: married vs. unmarried)×4(target attribute vocabulary: positive premaritalcohabitation vocabulary vs. negative premarital cohabitation vocabulary vs. active marriagevocabulary vs. negative marriage vocabulary) The gender and marital status are betweenvariables, in which gender has two levels of male and female, and marital status has twolevels of unmarried and married. The target attribute vocabulary belongs to within variablesand has four categories. The dependent variable is d’, i.e., the discriminability index.The third study is on implicit attitude of the subjects with or without children towardspremarital cohabitation, using GNAT measurement. The experiment is three-factor mixeddesign:2(gender: male vs. female)×2(child: with vs. without)×4(target attributevocabulary: positive premarital cohabitation vocabulary vs. negative premarital cohabitationvocabulary vs. active marriage vocabulary vs. negative marriage vocabulary) gender and childare between variables, in which the gender has two levels of male and female the child hastwo levels of with or without. The Dependent variable is d ’, i.e., the discriminability index.The following conclusions are reached: (1) The unmarried generation after the80s in urban hold more positive explicit attitudetowards premarital cohabitation than the married generation after the80s in urban.(2) There is significant gender difference between the explicit attitude towards premaritalcohabitation of the unmarried generation after the80s in urban, which shows the males holdmore positive attitude than the females.(3) There is significant gender difference between the explicit attitude towards premaritalcohabitation of the married generation after the80s in urban, which shows the males holdmore positive attitude than the females.(4) The unmarried generation after the80s in urban hold more positive implicitattitude towards premarital cohabitation than the married generation after the80s in urban.(5) There is no significant gender difference between the implicit attitude towardspremarital cohabitation of the unmarried generation after the80s in urban.(6) There is significant gender difference between the implicit attitude towardspremarital cohabitation of the married generation after the80s in urban, which shows themales hold more positive attitude than the females.(7) There is significant gender difference between the implicit attitude towardspremarital cohabitation of the married generation after the80s in urban with or withoutchildren, which shows the subjects without children hold more positive attitude than thosewith children.更多还原