醉酒标准与危险驾驶罪成立问题研究

【作者】 张明；

【导师】 侯健；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 法律， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 交通运输业推动着社会的发展与进步,然而,任何事物都是一体两面,利弊并存。与之相伴随的是全国各地重大、恶性交通事故的频频发生,这极大地危害到广大人民群众的生命健康和财产安全。面对严峻的交通安全形势,第十一届全国人大常委会第十九次会议表决通过了《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(八)》,将醉酒驾驶纳入刑法的规制范围,但是其中的条文中并没有明确醉酒型危险驾驶罪的情节条件,从而导致了学界对醉酒驾驶行为是否需要情节条件限制,是否达到醉酒标准就一律入罪问题的争议。因此,本文拟从综合角度分析论证醉酒驾驶行为入罪问题。全文由引言和正文五章以及结束语组成。第一章详述了危险驾驶罪的立法过程与相关争议,说明了《刑法修正案(八)》的立法背景。第二章从刑法原理角度对醉酒驾驶行为入罪问题进行分析,具体包括为何要将醉酒驾驶入罪问题,入罪后在行政、司法实践中如何认定醉酒驾驶问题以及醉酒驾驶是否有情节限制,是否一律入罪问题。第三章从国内外比较研究角度对醉酒驾驶行为入罪问题进行分析论证,主要是比较大陆法系和英美法系国家和地区对醉酒驾驶入罪问题的相关立法规定,分析其相同点与不同点,找出一般规律,以期对我国的相关制度建设和司法实践有所启示。第四章从法律解释角度对醉酒驾驶入罪问题展开分析论证,主要是通过文义解释、体系解释、历史解释、目的解释四种常用法律解释方法来论证醉酒驾驶是否一律入罪问题。第五章从醉酒驾驶入罪以来实施的社会效果来分析论证醉酒驾驶是否一律入罪问题。结束语在总结全文的基础上表明本文基本观点,即醉酒驾驶是否一律入罪问题,并对醉酒驾驶行为的相关法律制度完善作出展望。更多还原

【Abstract】 The vigorous development of the transport industry has greatly promoted the rapid development and progress of society, however, everything is one on both sides, including advantages and disadvantages. The significant and vicious traffic accidents occur frequently throughout the country, which has a great deal of harm to the majority of people’s lives and health and property security. Facing a serious traffic safty situation,the nineteenth meeting of the NPC Standing Committee voted on the PRC Criminal Law Amendment (eight), making the drunken driving into the scope of criminal law regulation, but the provision doesn’t clearly stipulate drunken driving ’s plot conditions, resulting a lot of controversies to whether drunken driving behavior needs plot constraints, and whether drunk driving behavior is convicted controversy in the academia. Therefore, the paper plan to analyze the problem of drunken driving behavior into crime from the principle of criminal law research, domestic and international legislation comparison research, legal interpretation research and the social effects of the issued amendment of the criminal law (eight) four aspects.The full text includes the introduction, five chapters and Conclusion.Introduction mainly adopt large amounts of data, cases to introduced the latest revision content of the Criminal Law Amendment (eight), as well as the vice president of the highest court drunken driving interpretation which leads to a lot of discussion on drunken driving shall be incriminating issues. The first chapter details the legislative process of the crime of dangerous driving and related dispute, in order to brief the legislative background of the Criminal Law Amendment (eight). The second chapter analyzes the drunken driving behavior from the perspective of criminal law principle, including questions of why drunk driving conviction, of how to identify drunken driving in the administrative, judicial practice, of whether drunken driving need plot restrictions, or whether incriminating. The third chapter gives a analysis and appraisal to the crime problem of drunken driving behavior from domestic and international legislation comparison research, mainly including relevant legislative provisions of civil law and common law countries and regions.Based on a brief analysis we hope to get a in-depth understanding in order to do an in-depth study about drunken driving conviction. The fourth chapter plan to give a in depth analysis and description to the problem of drunken driving behavior into crime, mainly explained by the context, systematic interpretation, historical interpretation, the purpose interpretation to proveall drunken driving behavior s are incriminating. The chapter five analyze the argument that drunken driving shall not be incriminating from the implementationof the social effects of Criminal Law Amendment (eight).Conclusion on the basis of the full text continues to expect the perfection of the legal systems of the drunken driving behavior.更多还原