【作者】 刘珊；

【导师】 廖建桥；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 企业管理， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 在知识经济迅猛发展的今天，科研合作逐渐成为科学研究的主流方式，同时也成为国内外研究的热点话题。以往研究主要集中在不同学科合作方式的对比上，我们对国家间科研合作模式差异的认识还不充分。尤其针对那些在中国起步较晚的学科，这种差异认识就意义重大。因此本文选取六本中国和美国顶级管理学期刊2001-2010年刊载的论文为研究对象，分别从个体层面、组织层面、国家层面对中美两国管理学科研合作模式进行了对比分析，以期为中国管理学学者选择合适的科研合作模式提供一定的实践指导。本研究共分为五个部分，第一部分为绪论，阐述了本研究的背景、意义、目的、创新之处及结构安排。第二部分对科研合作原因、科研合作模式、科研合作影响效果的相关文献进行了回顾。第三部分报告了数据来源与数据搜集方法，并对研究样本进行了整体描述。第四部分首先对中美管理学科研合作概况进行了简要描述，然后对两国管理学科研合作模式及其对科研产出的影响进行了对比，经过数据分析，我们发现：(1)中国管理学以师生合作为主，美国以师师合作为主；(2)中国管理学以机构内合作为主，美国以机构间合作为主，但剔除师生合作数据后，中国管理学老师间的合作也以机构间合作为主；(3)从不同合作模式对文章被引次数的影响来看，对中国管理学论文，合著能提高论文平均被引次数，但当作者超过3人时，论文平均被引次数并不随作者人数的继续增加而增加，且机构内合作论文与机构间合作论文在平均被引次数上并无显著差异；对美国管理学论文，4人合著的论文平均被引次数最高，且机构间合作论文的平均被引次数比机构内合作论文更高，而跨国合作论文与本国合作论文在平均被引次数上没有显著差异。最后，第五部分对本文的研究结论进行了总结，并提出了本研究的局限性及未来研究的展望。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the rapid development of knowledge economy, the scientificcollaboration is becoming the mainstream of scientific research, and thescientific collaboration has become one of the hottest topics from home tooverseas. The previous studies focused on the comparison ofcollaboration types between different subjects, and the comparativeanalysis between different countries is sufficient. This article draws acomparison of collaboration types between America and China on thefield of management from individually, organizationally and nationallyrespectively.This thesis was divided into five chapters. Chapter1mainlyintroduced the background, significance, purpose, innovation andstructural arrangements of this study. Chapter2was a literature reviewabout scientific incentives, types, and the influence on the scientificoutput. Chapter3reported the source of data, the gathering method of data and gave a brief description of the samples. Chapter4firstly gave anoverall description of scientific collaboration in America and China, thendrew a comparison of collaboration types and the influence on scientificoutput between America and China on the field of management and thedata showed that:(1) On the field of management, the cooperationbetween teacher and graduate student is the mainstream collaborationtype in China and in America the mainstream type is the collaborationbetween teacher and teacher;(2) The universities in China focus oninternal-institutional collaboration, whereas the American universitiesfocus on external-institutional collaboration; after eliminating theteacher-graduate collaboration data, the mainstream collaboration typebetween teachers are external-institutional;(3) In China, co-authorshipcan increase the mean citations of the article but if the number of authorsexceeds3, the mean citations would not increase then, and the meancitations differences between external-institutional andinternal-institutional articles are not significant; In America, the articles contain4authors secure more citations than others, and the meancitations of external-institutional articles are significantly higher thaninternal-institutional ones. Lastly, we put forward the conclusion of thisstudy, as well as the research limitations and future study directions.更多还原