【作者】 李俊杰；

【导师】 安国峰；

【作者基本信息】 延边大学 ， 汉语言文字学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 本文以泛义动词“搞”为研究对象,详细分析了“搞”在汉语中出现的语境,采取形式与意义、共时与历时、归纳与分析相结合的方法,在吸收专家学者成果的基础上,探讨和分析了“搞”的句法、语义、语用功能和“搞”的历史演变过程。全文共分五章,具体内容大致如下：第一章,绪论,介绍了本文的研究目的及意义、研究思路和方法以及语料来源,总结了前人的相关研究成果,对“搞”的意义进行了限定,在前人研究的基础上提出自己的观点,即“搞”是一个泛义动词。第二章,在语义方面,本文通过对“搞”在具体语境中的意义进行描写,研究“搞”的语义特征：“搞”主要有泛义性、虚义性、口语色彩浓、含贬义倾向等语义特征。并辨析“搞”和“弄”语义的异同点,进一步分析“搞”的意义。第三章,在句法层面,主要考察“搞”的述宾结构、述补结构,并对“搞”的重叠式着重分析。“搞”的宾语大多是名词性的,有些情况下也可接动词宾语；“搞”的述补结构要相对复杂。“搞”重叠式表达的意义是小量、短时,语法功能既有和一般动词共同的地方,也有自己独有的方面。本章还对“搞”字进行了“格语法”理论分析,这是本文创新点。第四章,从语用方面看,“搞”的语用功能主要有：模糊功能、替代功能、关系功能。本章对“弄”的模糊功能的意义和表现进行了分析和研究；对“搞”的替代功能的表现,“搞”所能替代及不能替代的动词以及“搞”的替代功能的作用进行了研究；对“搞”的关系功能的表现进行了分析。此外,本章还分析了句子中省去“搞”的情况,分析了“搞”与语境的关系,“搞”的修辞功能,“搞”的语用价值。最后是结语部分,对本文的内容进行概括和总结,指出本文的不足之处。更多还原

【Abstract】 The verb" do" as the research object, In detail analysis of the" engage" appears in the Chinese context, to take form and meaning, synchronic and diachronic, induction and analysis of the method of combining experts and scholars, in the absorption on the basis of the results, discussion and analysis of the" engage" the syntactic, semantic, pragmatic function and" engage" the historical evolution process.The full text divides into five chapters, specific content is as follows:The first chapter, introduction, explains the research purpose and significance, research ideas and methods as well as the data source, summarizes the relevant research results, to "engage" the significance of the limit, on the basis of previous studies put forward their own views, namely" do" is a verb.The second chapter, at the syntactic level, mainly on the" engage" the predicate-object structure, Predicate-complement structure, and to" engage" the overlapping type analysis." Engage" the object is a noun, in some cases can also be connected with the object of a verb;" engage" the Predicate-complement structure is relatively complex." Get" overlapping expression meaning is small, short-term, grammatical functions and general verb has both common place, also have their own unique aspects. This chapter also to "engage" the word for a" grammar" theory, which is the innovative points in this paper.The third chapter, in the aspect of semantics, this article through to" engage" in the specific meaning in context description, study" engage" the semantic features:" engage" are polysemous, delexical, oral color is thick, containing derogatory intention semantic features. And" get" and" out of semantic similarities and differences, further analysis of the meaning of done".The fourth chapter, from the pragmatic perspective," engage" the pragmatic function mainly have: fuzzy function, replacement function, the relationship between the function. The chapter on" get" fuzzy function and performance is analyzed and studied; to "engage" the replacement function," get" can replace and cannot be replaced by the verb" make" and alternative functional role of research; to "engage" the relationship between the function of performance of analysis of. In addition, this chapter also analyzes sentences out of do ","do" is analyzed with the context,"engage" the function of rhetoric," engage" the pragmatic value.The final part is the conclusion, of the contents of this paper generalize and sum up, pointed out the inadequacy of the paper.更多还原