【作者】 雷蕾；

【导师】 伍浩鹏；

【作者基本信息】 中南大学 ， 法律， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 非法言词证据排除规则是一项规范证据能力的证据规则,其核心是确定非法言词证据的效力问题。该规则因为其自身所具有诉讼价值及其在刑事诉讼中所独有的地位,为世界上大多数国家采纳,并且成为联合国一项刑事司法准则。本文比较了英美法系国家和大陆法系国家在立法和司法理论上的不同作法,分析了非法言词证据排除规则在我国的立法现状、司法现状和理论研究现状,指出完善非法言词证据排除规则是保障公民享有宪法规定的基本权利的需要；是构建现代刑事诉讼制度和保障司法公正的需要；是与国际刑事司法准则接轨的需要。并对如何完善我国的非法言词证据排除规则提出了构想,提出应当在立法中确立并完善非法言词证据排除规则,并建立相关的程序制度和配套制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 The exclusionary rule for illegal words evidence is a rule of evidence that standardizes the qualification of evidence, whose central question is to define its effect. Because of its own value of lawsuit and unique role in criminal suit, this rule is adopted by most of countries in the world, and turns into a criminal judicial standard of UN. This thesis compares the different modus operandi of legislation and legal theory between the countries of Anglo-American and Continental law system; analyzes this rule’s present situation of legislation, judicature and the fundamental research in our country; improves this rule and establishes related procedure systems and supporting systems.更多还原