节点文献
论我国民事答辩失权制度的构建
The Analysis on the Built of Loss of the Right to Reply System in the Civil Procedure
【作者】 张利；
【导师】 邵华；
【作者基本信息】 中南大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2012， 硕士
【摘要】 作为民事诉讼审前程序之一的答辩失权制度,目前在我国立法上并无明确规定,导致被告对待诉讼答辩比较随意,致使民事诉讼改革试图通过审前程序固定争点、整理证据的功能无法实现。与此同时,被告任意答辩给司法实践也带来极大的困扰,如举证规则混乱、诉讼突袭、庭审效率低下等现象已成为民事诉讼的“顽疾”。借此《民事诉讼法》修改之机,理论界和实务界对我国现行答辩制度进行了反思,结果是一致认同我国现行的答辩制度与诉讼模式已不相适应,建议修改。作为两大法系共有的制度设计——答辩失权制度,虽然表述不同,制度安排不尽一致,但却有着共同的诉讼机理和诉讼价值目标,有着共同的规律可循。这无疑为我国答辩失权制度的建立提供了可资借鉴的立法例。答辩失权的制度特色、功能定位已经取得了理论界的共识。其在保障当事人的程序性权利,规范当事人答辩,完善审前程序等方面发挥着不可替代的作用。但是,在是否引进答辩失权制度问题上理论界产生了较大的分歧。理论上的争鸣有利于对答辩失权制度的深入研究,本文以理论界日益激烈的争论：是否应该答辩失权的争论开篇,在分析国外先进立法例并进行移植的基础上分析答辩失权的疑难问题,并试图解决以下三方面的问题：是何为答辩失权；二是失权的正当性问题；三是我国现阶段应该建立怎样的答辩失权制度。
【Abstract】 As one part of the pre-trial civil proceedings, the loss-of-right to defense system is not clearly defined in our legislation, which leads to the defendant answer randomly. Therefore, the objective of civil litigation reform can not be achieved, such as exploring the issues, collecting evidence. If defendants refuse to answer the pleading in the pre-trial proceedings, it will make the civil litigation become inefficient. While the Chinese Civil Procedure Law will be revised again this year, many theorists and practitioners initiated we should build the defense system to advocate the civil procedure reform.The lost-of-right to defense system is common in civil law and common law system, which have respective different arrangement, but their mechanism and targets identical. Above-mentioned model undoubtedly provides reference cases for the establishment of our loss-of-right to defense system. It has make consensus on the characteristic, function of loss-of-right to defense. However, a great quality differences are put up if it should be employed in china.Therefore, the theoretical contention is conducive to the research on loss-of-right to defense. The author analyzed the tough question on the basis of the legal principle and introduction of the loss-of-right to defense. this desire to pre-trial proceedings in the interpretation of the legal basis of the premise and basis of the system of foreign transplant perspective of the new upper right of the respondent’s loss of difficult problems, and attempt to solve the following three issues:firstly, what the loss-of-right defense system is; secondly, legitimacy of the loss-of-right; Thirdly, how China should establish the loss-of-right to defense system.