节点文献
论刑事司法鉴定启动程序
On the Procedure of Starting Criminal Judicial Identification
【作者】 刘波；
【导师】 张善燚；
【作者基本信息】 中南大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2012， 硕士
【摘要】 刑事司法鉴定启动程序作为刑事诉讼的特殊环节,包含着申请、决定、鉴定人选任及权利救济等内容,是诉讼程序中对权利义务的归属产生直接决定作用的环节。刑事司法鉴定启动程序是控辩审三方在完成诉讼任务过程中相互作用形成的一种机制,对其产生重大影响的则是司法体制中所具有的若干理念,包括控辩平等的诉讼理念、程序正义的诉讼理念、程序参与的诉讼理念。我国现行的司法鉴定启动程序移植了前苏联的制度体系,在权利的分配上,司法机关享有司法鉴定启动的决定权,而当事人仅享有申请补充鉴定和重新鉴定的权利。域外考察大陆法系和英美法系国家有关司法鉴定启动程序的规定,为我们在制度完善的进路上提供了诸多参考因素,其中最重要的就是强调当事人的程序参与性。本文在为完善我国刑事司法鉴定启动程序的制度设计上提供了自己思考的意见,主要包括审前阶段对鉴定范围及决定主体的限定,一审时主要明确中请权、决定权及异议权的分配,而在二审中开始强调法官对于鉴定理由及范围的审查以及鉴定次数的控制。此外,整个过程赋予了当事人较多的救济权利。
【Abstract】 The procedure of starting criminal judicial identification is a special part of criminal proceedings. It Contains application、determining、 selecting expert and relieving right. It is a link which has a decisive role to the attribution of rights and obligations in criminal proceedings. The procedure of starting criminal judicial identification is a mechanism which is formed by the interaction among the prosecutor、the defense and the judge. The idea as the equality between the prosecutor and the defense、procedural justice and the statutory procedures.The procedure of starting criminal judicial identification in our country has inherited the system of The Soviet Union. In allocating rights, the judiciary has the power to start the procedure of criminal judicial identification. And the suspect or the defendant only can apply to identification again or addition-ally. By studying system about the start program of criminal judicial identification in Anglo-American law and Civil law country, we can accept more useful information to improve our system. The most important point is emphasizing participatory for people.In my article, I propose my view in improving the system of the procedure of starting criminal judicial identification. Firstly, we should limit the range and the power of identification in the stage before trial. How to assign the right of application、etermining and opposition in The First Trial. We also should emphasize in The Second Trial that judge censor the range and reason of appraisal and control frequency. At last, the man who have be suspected and sued should be accorded more right for relief.