【作者】 高宇征；

【导师】 牛云平；

【作者基本信息】 河北大学 ， 英语语言文学， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 翻译批评是翻译学的重要组成部分之一,翻译批评标准是翻译批评理论的核心问题。长期以来,翻译批评的理论建设相对薄弱,致使翻译批评长期处于一种非理性状态,出现了一些浅评、误评、乃至翻译批评缺席的情况,而关于翻译批评标准的较为系统的专门研究则更为不足。有鉴于此,本文在梳理、借鉴前人相关研究的基础上,探索了翻译批评标准的动态多元性特征,尝试提出了一种译作评价的标准体系：(1)文本标准：论述了忠实标准的一元性和多元性特征,从意义、语音、意象、意境、神、形、风格、效果八个层面阐述了其具体内容；(2)探讨了非文本标准的社会、文化、语言的重要层面。翻译批评的理性发展,除了相对规范的标准体系之外,作为翻译批评主体的批评者也是不可忽视的重要因素,因此本文最后从学术标准和道德标准两方面讨论了批评者的自律标准,以期对翻译批评的健康发展有所裨益。更多还原

【Abstract】 As an essential part of translation studies, translation criticism plays an indispensable role in translation theory and practice. The study of translation criticism criteria is at the very core of the theory of translation criticism. However, due to its underdevelopment, translation criticism has long been in an unsound state so as to result in some superficial or false criticism and even the failure of its proper role in translation practice. Few efforts have been made to formulate a systematic study on translation criticism criteria. In view of this situation, based on a brief review of the existing studies of translation criticism, this thesis attempts to explore the dynamic and multiple features of translation criticism and suggest a comprehensive model of translation criticism. This system includes:(1) Text criteria. In this part, the unitary and multiple features of the criterion of faithfulness are expounded from the aspects of meaning, phonetics, image, artistic conception, spirit, form, style and effect. (2) Non-text criteria. This part discusses the aspects of society, culture and language of the non-text criteria. To conduct translation criticism properly, the leading factor of the critic cannot be ignored. Therefore, the self-discipline criteria for the critic are discussed at the end so as to be beneficial to the sound development of translation criticism.更多还原