节点文献
渎职罪罪数问题的司法认定
Judicial Determination of the Number of Crimes of Dereliction of Duty
【作者】 王晋;
【作者基本信息】 山西大学 , 法律, 2012, 硕士
【摘要】 当前渎职罪呈多发态势,已成为腐败犯罪的一种严重形态。这不但阻碍经济社会发展,破坏社会公平与正义,而且严重损害了党和政府的执政能力,容易引发党的执政危机。因此,坚决打击渎职犯罪日渐为社会所关注和重视。渎职犯罪作为国家机关工作人员不正当履行职责的犯罪表现形式,往往与贪污贿赂、其他刑事犯罪交织在一起。实践中出现数罪并罚、择一重罪处罚和单一罪名处罚的情形,如何全面评价和查处不正当履行职责的国家机关工作人员的行为是反渎职侵权实务中面临的难题。本文正是在此背景下,对渎职罪罪数问题予以重点分析和研究,并采用了比较分析法、案例分析法等综合分析研究方法,从理论和实践上寻找解决罪数问题的方法原则。本文由引言、正文、结论三部分组成,共一万八千字。引言主要介绍当前进行渎职罪罪数问题研究的价值和意义。第二部分正文主要分为三层次,四部分第一层通过收集实践中渎职罪与贪污受贿犯罪、其他刑事犯罪竞合时案件处断意见的分歧,总结渎职罪在定罪中存在的罪数问题。第一章“渎职罪罪数司法认定中存在的问题”。通过五个案例提出当前渎职犯罪一罪与数罪处断意见分歧,以及现阶段解决渎职罪罪数问题的法律困惑,分析渎职犯罪罪数认定上的两大问题。第二层通过明确渎职罪的概念及渎职罪的罪数问题,确定渎职罪罪数问题处断的原则和衡量标准,来解决渎职犯罪中具体罪名之间的处断。第二章“渎职罪罪数问题的理论基础”。根据我国现行立法理论,确立了以犯罪构成作为断定一罪与数罪的标准,而且还需要要坚持罪刑法定原则、禁止重复评价原则。第三章“渎职犯罪罪数问题的司法认定”。主要介绍分析了渎职罪与受贿罪竞合时的认定,渎职罪与贪污罪、挪用公款罪竞合时罪数认定,以及渎职犯罪之间的罪数认定问题。第三层次对解决渎职罪罪数问题提出的处理建议。第四章“结论”,对渎职罪处断中遇到的问题提出四点建议以供参考。
【Abstract】 Nowadays,the crime of dereliction of duty was prone posture,has become a serious form of corruption crime. Not only hinder the development of economy and society and disruption of social fairnesss and justice, and serious damage to the party and the government’s ability to govern, easily lead to the ruling crisis. Resolutely crack down on crimes of dereliction of duty by the social concern and attention.The crime of dereliction of duty as a functionary of a state organ unfair to perform the duties of the crime form, often with other crimes of corruption and bribery, interweave together, which occur in the practice of concurrent punishment for several crimes, punish the felony charges and single penalty situation, how to comprehensively evaluate and investigate unfair to perform the duties of the state organs and staff behavior is malfeasance practice problems. This article is in this context, the crime of dereliction of duty crime number of problems to be focused on the analysis and research, and the use of comparative analysis, case analysis and other research methods of comprehensive analysis, from theory and Practice for solving the problems of crime numbers constructive principles of law.This paper consists of introduction, text, conclusion of three parts, a total of18000characters.The first part introduces the crime of dereliction of duty crime question research value and significance.The second part of the text mainly is divided into three levels, the four part.The first layer by collecting the practice of bribery and corruption crimes of dereliction of duty, other criminal cases when competing at the differences of opinion, summary conviction of malfeasance in the problem of crime number.The first chapter of" the crime of dereliction of duty crime in judicial determination problems". The five case presented the current crime of dereliction of duty crime of breaking and differences of opinion, show level to solve the crime of dereliction of duty crime issues of legal confusion, the crime of dereliction of duty crime number analysis identified two major problems.Second layer through the clear concept of crime of dereliction of duty crime of dereliction of duty and the number of crime, the crime of dereliction of duty crime problems identified at the principles and standards, to solve the crime of dereliction of duty charges between the broken concrete.The second chapter is" dereliction of duty crime number theory". According to our current legislation theory, established by the constitution of a crime as a crime of judge standard, but also need to adhere to the principle of legality, the principle of prohibiting repeatable evaluationThe third chapter is" the crime of dereliction of duty crime problems of judicial determination". Mainly introduced the analysis of malpractice crime and bribery crime cognizance of the crime of dereliction of duty at the same time, with the crime of corruption, crime of misappropriating public funds crime number that when competing, as well as the crime of dereliction of duty between crime number identification problem.The third level is to solve the crime of dereliction of duty crime problems recommendations.The fourth chapter is "epilogue", for the crime of dereliction of duty at problems and puts forward four suggestions for reference.