【作者】 李萍；

【导师】 马明贤；

【作者基本信息】 兰州大学 ， 民法学， 2012， 硕士

【副题名】以“周雨珣诉北大人民医院医疗损害赔偿案”为例

【摘要】 医生的注意义务是对医生这一特殊职业的要求,它要求医生在对患者诊疗过程中尽到所应尽的注意义务,如果医生在此过程中违反了医生注意义务,那么就应当承担与其注意义务相对应的责任。由于医生注意义务内容的不同,因此判断医生是否违反医生注意义务的标准也依注意义务的不同而存在差异。判断一个医生所实施的医疗行为是否存在过失,关键在于其是否违反了医生的注意义务。因此判断医生是否违反医生注意义务是处理医疗纠纷的关键。另外,在不构成医疗事故的情况下,违反医生注意义务而使患者受到一定损害,应该承担什么样的责任也是当今社会众所关注的问题。其归根到底,都和医生注意义务相关。因此,对医生注意义务的研究在实践中对处理医疗纠纷有着重要的指导意义。本文所选择的案例,是审判实务中遇到的典型医疗纠纷案例。首先对基本案情及审理情况作了简单介绍,总结了本案在两审过程中存在的争议焦点。第二部分重点对本案的争议焦点作了详细的分析。依据医生注意义务的内容及判断标准分析了医生在诊疗过程中是否违反相应的注意义务,并对医院所承担的责任问题进行了分析,在对案例争议焦点详细分析的基础上,得出我国医疗纠纷案件在司法实践中所存在的主要问题。最后,针对本文所分析的问题笔者认为应在医疗事故技术鉴定的公正性、拥有医学知识背景法官队伍的建设、医生注意义务相关规范的细化方面加以完善。希望本文的论述能够为我国医疗纠纷案件的司法实践提供有益参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 The doctor’s duty of care requirements of the doctors in this specialty occupations, It requires doctors to do the bounden duty of care in the diagnosis and treatment of patients, If the doctor in this process in violation of the doctor’s duty of care, then he should bear the responsibility of his duty of care that corresponds to.Medical doctor’s attention to the obligations of the different content, so the judge is a violation of the standards of the doctor’s duty of care in accordance with the duty of the different differences, medical practices implemented by the judge a doctor is at fault, the key lies in its violation of the doctor’s duty of care. Therefore judge that the doctor is a violation of medical duty of care is the key to dealing with medical disputes. In addition, if it does not constitute medical malpractice case, violation of the doctors to pay attention to the obligation to make patients subject to certain damage should bear what responsibility today social concern that. The final analysis, are related with the doctor’s duty of care. Therefore, the obligations of medical attention in the practice of important guiding significance in dealing with medical disputes.The selected case is a typical case of medical disputes encountered in the trial practice. First this article briefly introduced case and trial, and to summarize the case in the two trial process focus of controversy. The second part focuses on the focus of controversy in this case made a detailed analysis. It based on the content and criteria of the doctors duty of care, doctors are in breach of the duty of care and analysis the question of responsibility by the hospital, Draw the main problems of the medical dispute cases in China in the judicial practice on the basis of detailed analysis of the cases a focus of controversy, Finally, The analysis for this problem I believe that the fairness of the Medical Malpractice, with the construction of medical knowledge background of judges, doctors pay attention to the obligations related to specification refinement to be improved. I hope this article’s discusses the judicial practice of medico1malpractice cases provide a useful reference.更多还原