【作者】 李鹏；

【导师】 王清红；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 应用心理学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 目的探讨应届毕业大学生心理契约的构成维度与具体内容,初步编制针对应届毕业大学生这一特定人群的心理契约问卷,并对问卷进行信度与效度检验。方法通过以往文献的查阅与分析,归纳出符合我国实际情况的应届毕业大学生心理契约的构成部分及各自维度。通过半结构式访谈以及以往问卷条目的收集总结,编制出预试问卷进行小范围预测试,然后根据预测试结果对预试问卷进行修改形成问卷初稿。正式对样本一测试,通过探索性因素分析剔除不符题目确定正式问卷,然后进行项目分析、相关分析等检验量表的信度与效度。通过对样本二的测试,进行验证性因素分析进一步检验问卷的结构合理性。结果(1)正式问卷由组织责任与个体责任两部分构成,其中组织责任部分包含18个项目,个体责任部分包含17个项目。(2)由因素分析结果可以看出心理契约组织责任与个体责任部分均包含三个因子,即现实责任、发展责任与理念责任,其中组织责任各因子共解释方差总变异43.39%,个体责任各因子共解释方差总变异53.25%。(3)组织责任部分总问卷的重测信度为0.863,Cronbach’a系数为0.861,分半信度为0.792(p均<0.01)；个体责任部分总问卷的重测信度为0.897,Cronbach’a系数为0.853；分半信度为0.774(p均<0.01)。(4)验证性因素分析结果为组织责任部分χ2/df的值1.79,RMSEA为0.058,RMR为0.062,GFI为0.90,AGFI为0.87,NFI为0.89,CFI为0.95；个体责任部分χ2/df的值2.48, RMSEA为0.078,RMR为0.057,GFI为0.88,AGFI为0.84,NFI为0.93,CFI为0.96。数据表明,施测数据与理论模型拟合较好。结论本研究初步完成了应届毕业大学生心理契约问卷的编制工作,通过研究表明,问卷的维度设想与最终结果符合,问卷的信、效度也符合心理测量学的要求,能够作为一个简单实用的测量工具,有效的利用于应届毕业大学生心理契约测量以及就业指导工作。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective The study is aimed at discussing on structural dimensions and content of the psychological contract of graduating college students, developing a specially designed psychological questionnaire for them, and exam the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.Methods By literature study and analysis, the psychological contract of graduating college students was summarized. After semi-structural interviews and summaries of the questionnaire items, forecasting questionnaire was developed and surveyed to a small sample, which was revised according to the results of the survey and formulated into the initial questionnaire. The survey on the sample1was conducted then. Inappropriate questions were deleted through exploratory factor analysis, and the formal questionnaire was developed. The reliability and validity of the scale was examined. Structural rationality of the questionnaire was further examined through the survey on the sample2.Results (1)Formal questionnaire includes2parts. The part of organizational responsibility consists of18items and the other part of individual responsibility consists of17items.(2)Factor analysis on the structure suggested that the psychological contract’s2parts each has3factors:reality responsibility, development responsibility and concept responsibility. The part of organizational responsibility’s factors explain43.39%of the total variance respectively. The part of individual responsibility’s factors explain53.25%.(3)In the part of organizational responsibility, the test-retest reliability of total scale was0.863; The Cronbach’a coefficient was0.861; the split-half reliability was0.792(p<0.01). These3values were0.897,0.853,0.774(p<0.01) in the part of individual responsibility.(4)The Confirmatory Factor Analysis results indicated that data with the theoretical model fitted better. In the part of organizational responsibility, Values were as follows,χ2/df:1.79, RMSEA:0.058, RMR:0.062, GFI:0.90, AGFI:0.87, NFI:0.89, CFI:0.95. In the part of individual responsibility, Values were as follows,χ2/df:2.48, RMSEA:0.078, RMR:0.057, GFI:0.88, AGFI:0.84, NFI:0.93, CFI:0.96.Conclusions The research completed the formulation of the psychological contract questionnaire on graduating college students. The research suggested that the prediction of the structural dimensions of the questionnaire agreed with the final results, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire also met the psychological measuring needs. Therefore, the questionnaire could be a simple and practical measuring tool, and take efficient advantage of the questionnaire and college students’ employment guidance.更多还原