【作者】 李虹；

【导师】 谢明敦；

【作者基本信息】 北京邮电大学 ， 民商法学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 域名是互联网必不可少的重要资源,随着电子商务的迅速发展,域名的商业价值不断显现,也成为很多人追逐抢占的目标。这给传统的法律体制提出了新的挑战和要求。由于域名的特点及现阶段域名注册体制的不完善等各个方面原因,导致域名同现有的一些商标权等先在权益产生了一定的冲突,即域名纠纷。传统的司法诉讼程序在解决域名纠纷问题上有诸多不足和缺陷,一种方便、快捷、独立、公正的“准行政措施”—全球统一域名纠纷解决机制(UDRP)就孕育而生。该机制主要由《统一域名争议解决政策》及相关程序规则组成,是由互联网络名称及数字分配公司(ICANN)制定并实施的。我国在充分借鉴了UDRP的基础上,同时结合本国的实际国情于2002年制定并实施了《中国互联网络信息中心域名争议解决办法》(CNDRP)及相关程序规则。通过近10多年的实践,该机制已经日趋成熟,也已经成为现阶段解决域名纠纷的主要途径。本文通过对域名纠纷解决机制的研究和介绍,对域名纠纷解决机制的实体问题及程序问题进行了探讨,为我国的域名纠纷解决机制的构建提出了相关的意见和建议。本文主体内容分为五个部分。第一章介绍了两个案例,针对案例引出了域名纠纷在实践中遇到的问题。第二章是域名纠纷的理论研究,分析了域名的特点、域名的性质以及域名纠纷产生的原因和类型。第三章介绍了国际上对域名纠纷解决的实践经验。选取了具有典型代表的美国、英国和日本,并且总结了各个国家的优势和缺陷。继而重点介绍了全球统一域名争议解决机制的建立及实践,同时提出以下几点建议：1、细化关于“商标及服务标志”的相关规定,防止专家组超越职权范围的裁决。2、论述了投诉三要件中恶意主观要件的虚设,建议将“非恶意”主观要件的举证责任转移给被投诉人。3、建议UDRP中加入专家组上诉机制。第四章介绍了我国解决域名纠纷方面的司法实践及“准行政措施”,对CNDRP实践中程序问题与实体问题进行了探讨。一方面建议吸收UDRP的相关规定,另一方面结合本国实际有必要设立个人域名注册以减少域名纠纷。第五章从域名注册、域名审核以及域名纠纷解决三个方面提出了完善域名纠纷解决机制的建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 A domain name is a necessary address resource for the internet. With the advancement of the electronic network, many people are crowding into this field because the commercial value of the domain name is increasing rapidly.Because the domain name registration system is not perfect and other supporting measures are incomplete, the domain name dispute is inevitably produced. The traditional judicial procedure to solve the domain name dispute has some shortcomings. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and the Rules(UDRP),a kind of new dispute resolution mechanism, has been widely applied in the world and even becomes a model for many countries and regions. At the same time, In china, related regulations have been drafted to deal with the disputes on the basis of UDRP----Cnnic Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy(CNDRP). Over ten years of practicing make this system more mature and the leading approach to solve the disputes. This paper researchs and introduces the domain name dispute resolution mechanism.and puts forward relevant comments and suggestions about the entity and procedure problemsThe paper could be grouped into five parts. The first chapter puts forward main questions against two cases. The second chapter introduces domain name dispute theory, including the characteristics of the domain name,and the causes of the domain name dispute and types. The third chapter presents the domain name dispute resolution of all the international experience. Three typical countrie are chosen—America Britain and Japan to analyse and summarize the strengths and weaknesses of each country. Then to focus on analyzing Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and the Rules, and to put forward the following suggestions:1、Refining about the rule on "trademarks and service marks".2、Transfering the burden of proof of the subjective factor to the complainant.3、adding appeal mechanism. Chapter five puts forward some opinions of the domain name dispute resolution mechanism in China on the aspects of the domain name registration, domain name audits, and domain name dispute resolution.更多还原